Send comments, tips,
and suggestions to:
DrugWarRant
Join us on Pete's couch.
couch

DrugWarRant.com, the longest running single-issue blog devoted to drug policy, is published by the Prohibition Isn't Free Foundation
facebooktwitterrss
May 2010
M T W T F S S
« Apr   Jun »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Archives

Authors

Who is responsible for the dead dog in Missouri?

By now, the entire internet knows about the SWAT raid in Missouri that ended up with a dead dog. It woke up a lot of people, and angered a lot more who were already awake.

Almost nobody believed that it was right, regardless of political viewpoint. In this sense, the video (which was obtained by the Columbia Daily Tribune through a public records request) has served an incredibly important function.

It also got a lot of people wanting to blame someone. The question was “Who?”.

Von at Obsidian Wings writes

Folks talk about the banality of evil. It’s one of those cliches that you hear from time time. But I don’t think that folks stop very often to think about what that phrase means. Or what it looks like in action. Evil becomes banal when people — good people — stop recognizing it, stop appreciating it, and come to accept it as normal. When evil becomes so routine that good people accept it as the way of doing business.

I am not comparing the cops in the video to Nazis (whence the phrase comes). But it’s hard for me to see their actions, here, as anything other than evil. […]

This is what evil looks like. On this night, these cops decided to be thugs.

John Cole at Balloon Juice says:

I Hope These People Go to Hell […]

This is what happens when you give a bunch of cowboy assholes heavy weapons and fill them with a God complex.

Megan McArdle in The Atlantic takes a different focus

Short of multiple homicide, I’m having trouble coming up with anything that justifies that kind of police action. And you know, I doubt the police could either. But they weren’t busy trying to figure out if they were maximizing the welfare of their larger society. They were, in that most terrifying of phrases, just doing their jobs.

And in the end, that is our shame, not theirs.

Jonathan Perri of SSDP points out that the law is to blame:

“By making it illegal, you are making it criminal,” Perri said. “If a local liquor store breaks a law, you are not going to see a SWAT team raid the place and kill a dog. … You still have the alcohol abuse but don’t have people killing each other over it.”

And David Bordon points out the excesses of SWAT use today:

“The idea of SWAT was created for hostage situations and when military-style power is required and there is no other choice,” he said. “When going into a situation that the purpose is to preserve evidence, it’s not a good enough reason to put these thousands of people that are served search warrants each year through the aggressive and traumatic experience of a para-militarized police squadron entering your home.”

So who is responsible?

The answer is… everyone. And it’s complicated.

The politicians are to blame. Every day, they pass more bad laws, and refuse to correct the mistakes of the past, turning a blind eye to the destruction they cause. All the while, they fret about some non-existent 30-second attack ad, and take campaign contributions from drug war profiteers. Without the bad laws, the vast majority of these paramilitary raids wouldn’t have a reason to exist.

The federal bureaucrats are to blame. Every time they tell another lie about the drug war, they provide cover for the craven politicians, and blunt the outrage from the citizenry.

Local leadership is to blame. Seduced by the gift of toys from the military, local officials have gleefully accepted the tools of warfare in the hopes that people would think they had big dicks. Worse yet, they’ve actively made the decision to use SWAT-style raids in situations that are absolutely wrong. Their decisions have made it more dangerous for police, suspects, and the general citizenry.

They have failed to learn the difference between fighting a war and having a functioning police force. Once you decide to fight a war instead of policing, you have decided that the residents are acceptable collateral casualties of war.

The proof of this failure is evident in the statement by Deputy Police Chief Tom Dresner:

“If we were searching for stolen televisions in his house, there is no reason for SWAT,” he said. “He can’t flush televisions.”

He doesn’t even get the wrongness underlying his statement.

The entire philosophy behind SWAT-style drug raids is that the death of a mother, a child, or the family pet is an acceptable risk to prevent flushing. (Deep Thoughts)

What makes it worse is that you can’t actually flush large amounts of marijuana.

Local cops and SWAT officers are to blame. It can be convenient to say they’re just following orders, but the truth is that they do have some choice in not only choosing their job, but in how they actually perform that job. Even in the midst of a SWAT raid (even when it shouldn’t have happened to begin with), it’s possible to be safe and firm while still treating the suspects like human beings who are going through a traumatic experience and minimize both the trauma and the collateral damage.

The automatic shooting of a dog that is merely doing its job isn’t the sign of a cop that’s trying to balance safety with serving the public. A responsible cop could ask for better tools in dealing with such situations.

Task Force 6 Illinois

Unfortunately, too many of these cops have had the “war” mentality reinforced non-stop for them, like the cops that are part of the Illinois Task Force 6 in my area. When you see yourself this way every day at work, it’s hard to think of the citizenry as anything but the enemy.

Even without the reinforcement imagery, there’s a natural problem that crops up when you’re a cop doing mostly drug busts (and it does get compartmentalized that way). It’s the same problem that many treatment professionals have — generalization based on skewed personal experience.

My dad is a retired minister. He never used alcohol or went to places where alcohol was used or served. His total experience with alcohol was from those who were at the end of their rope and were coming to him for counseling and help. Alcoholics, domestic violence, etc. He didn’t really realize that there were people who used alcohol responsibly and was understandably upset when I started playing the piano in bars.

For drug cops, it’s too easy to get in the mindset that all drug suspects are non-human scum, and that affects how they do their job.

We’re all to blame. By not rising up and forcing change, we’re at fault for the death of that family member.

Yep. And that’s one of the reasons that I continue to spend so much time on this blog after almost 7 years.

It’s complicated.

In addition to calmly analyzing blame (and realizing that there’s plenty to go around), it’s also important to take a look at where focusing blame assignment will do the most good. That’s simple reality.

While it’s easiest to react viscerally to the images in that video and blame the specific cops in that house, that is the least valuable approach toward achieving real change — change that will save someone else’s family member in the future.

Whenever one of these tragedies happens — Tarika Wilson, Kathryn Johnston, Jonathan Ayers — I find myself torn when it’s announced that an investigation has been opened into one or more of the cops involved. The problem is, as soon as a cop is being investigated for wrong-doing, it generally means that the policy itself, and those who implemented it, will get a free pass.

Even if a cop rightly gets in trouble for his or her actions, it does very little to prevent future abuse.

I’m guardedly optimistic about the fact that, in the case of Columbia, the Tribune is talking about policy instead of individual cops, partly due to the efforts of SSDP and David Borden, among others. If we can keep the policy in the spotlight, we might do some good.

So yes, the answer is that pretty much everyone is at fault, but if we want it to change, we need to focus our blame on the policies and the laws.

We need local politicians besieged by concerned citizens who are afraid their homes will be invaded and their pets or children killed. And we need federal politicians fearing the votes of a motivated and concerned block of constituents.

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

61 comments to Who is responsible for the dead dog in Missouri?

  • […] as Pete Guither at DrugWarRant so eloquently puts it: The proof of this failure is evident in the statement by Deputy Police Chief Tom Dresner: “If we […]

  • […] change Most CommentedWho is responsible for the dead dog in Missouri? (52)The power (and challenges) of viral internet (42)America under drug war occupation (41)Judge […]

  • Paul Ketchum

    If the SWAT team never existed, it follows this incident would not have occurred.

    “Too much government is the cause of most bad government” Thomas Jefferson.

  • Jean boyd

    It is so obvious to me. Why would you not call them NAZI’s. I mean, they are swat team. Not a long shot from SWAT-stika. Why do you protect them. I mean, what are we gonna do to them. And they are sooooo scared. They know what they did. Will someone tell them that if they give it up, we are not going to lynch them. I mean, that is what they do, not us. We will probably forgive them in some way. But the dog. Now the partie’s over. I would be shaking if I was a cop who never tried to stop all this. Like if I was not in touch with that group “LEAP”. That is the Law Enforcement agaist Prohibition” Cause that is what caused the bloody battle and it was so prohibition. If you do not beleve me, then try and get a pain killer from your doctor. It is the drug war at the center of this. Please get this people, I mean sheeple, I have been looking at this mess for 30 years or more. We have been trying at Drug Policy groups to tell you this forever. And we are so glad that you are actually hearing us now. Just hang on and stand up for your rights. They the ones that is scaredy.

  • Jean boyd

    Thank you for the star. Can I just say one more thing since i been studying so long and I have lot to say about this. Look at the picture of the cops up there. And don’t be afraid to call it what it is. They are the Nazi gang. It is over now. We at the end of this war. Yeah, Yeah. People wake up and get some coffee and talk to your nabas about this. Try. OK. Cause I tired now. You say you see it now. My little sista is the one who figured it out in my family. I just asked the question. HeHeHe. I am laughing now. How many family members you lost in the drug war? MIne is maybe 10. Or maybe my entire family when you include who suff-ud. Including all my kids that I was only brave to bring into this world and why I fought this so hard so they could live in peace and get a break.

  • […] as Pete Guither at DrugWarRant so eloquently puts it: The proof of this failure is evident in the statement by Deputy Police Chief Tom Dresner: “If we […]

  • It’s tempting to blame the officers involved. They certainly have some culpability. But psychological experiments involving mock prisons, with students playing the roles of “prisoners” and “guards,” have shown that giving ordinary people absolute authority over others turns them into abusive tyrants.

    The system today gives entirely too much power to SWAT teams and to police in genera, and the demonization of marijuana and the people who choose to use it dehumanizes the millions of americans who find themselves on the wrong side of our unjust laws.

    Abuses like the one in Columbia are a predictable, and in fact inevitable, result of marijuana prohibition. The solution is to legalize responsible adult use of cannabis.

  • RickOden

    The dog was not a threat so I don’t see why it is Washington’s responsibility to teach officers to not kill babies, toddlers, the elderly, and harmless dogs. One would think it’s a no brainer.

  • KMAMF

    I’m former Law Enforcement and yet find the actions of these wanna-be cops inexcusable. I can assure you that no one will be held accountable for the undeserved slaughter of this helpless caged animal or the irreparable damage this will have on that little boy. Great system eh??? You shoot my dog and I’ll hunt you down. I hope you & yours rot in hell. Pathetic cowards!!

  • Hello,

    I thought both you and your readers might want to consider receiving free copy of Dead Rising 2. Here’s situation.
    I stumbled upon an online site – http://www.deadrising2forfree.info (i assumed was a total BS, because everyone knows you’ll find nothing “free” and I saw this type of websites before a lot), I chose to give it a go and clicked through, followed on-screen instructions – and here I am three weeks later with my brand-new shiny piece of plastic – Dead Rising 2 unboxed!

    Now get there and try it out yourself.

    Hope I added some value to your blog and someone gets as lucky as me!