Upcoming Press Conference on Wednesday

Press Release from MPP:

Television talk show host Montel Williams, who uses medical marijuana to treat the debilitating pain of multiple sclerosis, will join U.S. Representatives Barney Frank (D-MA), Maurice Hinchey (D-NY), and Sam Farr (D-CA) at a Capitol Hill press conference on May 4 at 2 p.m. to introduce bipartisan legislation to protect medical marijuana patients from arrest. Also speaking will be Angel Raich, the California medical marijuana patient whose lawsuit seeking protection from federal prosecution could be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court this month, and Irvin Rosenfeld, one of seven patients who still receives a monthly supply of medical marijuana from the U.S. government under a program closed to new enrollment in 1992.

After the press conference, Raich will lead a group of patients to visit members of Congress to lobby on behalf of the legislation; a leading opponent of medical marijuana will be presented with a list of patients who have died in the wake of a federal raid on their medical marijuana garden. The press is invited.

Let’s hope the press shows up.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Upcoming Press Conference on Wednesday

Are the states waking up?

Is it my imagination, or are we starting to see more of this kind of editorial?
From the Daytona Beach News Journal

Every 11 minutes, prison doors slam shut behind another American. The combined population of state and federal prisons and local jails reached 2.1 million last year, a number that keeps growing.

Florida accounts for a sizeable portion of that growth, incarcerating nearly 85,000. Here, as in the rest of the country, the inmate population is mostly young, mostly male, disproportionately minority. Corrections will claim more than $2 billion of the state’s budget for the coming fiscal year. That doesn’t include the money the state pays to support the court system, or the substantial sums each county spends on jails. And the inmates keep coming — the growth of Florida’s prison population far outpaces the increase in the general population.

Experts attribute the growth nationwide to the harshness of drug laws, a trend to give prison time for other convictions and the fact that inmates are more likely to serve longer sentences. Nearly half the inmates in this country are doing time for drug offenses.

The numbers are inescapable, and not without a noticable effect…

With so many people in prison, neighborhoods are losing the cohesion that provides an effective barrier against crime. The problem is fueled by the dead-end fate awaiting recently released convicts, who struggle to find jobs and re-establish family connections. Frustrated, many turn to crime again.

…leading to the inevitable conclusion…

But a smarter approach would look at the policies that have put so many behind bars. Mandatory sentencing laws that strip discretion from judges are a dismal failure, sending people to prison for relatively minor crimes at massive public expense. The nation’s drug laws are a shambles, assessing arbitrary penalties that hit hardest at low-income criminals who use inexpensive, highly addictive street drugs like crack cocaine. Most prison programs aimed at rehabilitation have fallen victim to budget cuts or political posturing.

The growing prison numbers — and public expense — show that this is a course the United States can no longer afford to follow.

Exactly.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Are the states waking up?

Are they really that stupid?

In the New York Times, via Jacob Sullum at Hit and Run:

Five years and $3 billion into the most aggressive counternarcotics operation ever here, American and Colombian officials say they have eradicated a record-breaking million acres of coca plants, yet cocaine remains as available as ever on American streets, perhaps more so.

“It’s very disturbing,” said a senior State Department official traveling here with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, who is on a five-day tour of the region.

Colombian traffickers still provide 90 percent of the cocaine used in the United States and 50 percent of the heroin, just as they did five years ago, the government says. “Key indicators of domestic cocaine availability show stable or slightly increased availability in drug markets throughout the country,” the White House drug policy office acknowledged in February. Officials added that prices have remained stable and purity has improved. …

Even with the contradictory results from the first five years, the Bush administration is asking Congress to extend Plan Colombia for at least one more year. The president’s budget proposal asks for another $734 million next year on top of the $2.9 billion already spent.

A senior State Department official who is involved in the Colombia program said, “Give us another year or so and see if there is any effect.”

At a news conference [in Bogota] on Tuesday, Ms. Rice said Washington had no intention of reassessing the program, adding that such a move would most likely take a long time to see results in the United States…

[Dan] Burton, the subcommittee chairman, said he was inclined to favor the president’s request to renew Plan Colombia financing.

This is five times as much as the federal government spends on the arts. Now you may disagree with arts funding, and you may not like all the art that comes from arts funding, but arts funding at least doesn’t destroy the rainforest, increase international violence and terrorism, spread poison on poor farmers’ crops with nothing to show for it — at least with the arts funding you can get a pretty good symphony and some excellent arts in the schools now and then.
So yes, really. I want to know. Are they really that stupid?
A prominent blogger recently accused me of being a fanatic because I assumed my opponents were either dishonest or uninformed. OK, then, I’m a fanatic. For what choice do I have when my opponents fail to provide any logical explanation for their positions, while at the same time refusing to even seriously consider alternate solutions?
I cannot, and will not, sit here and say “Well, they must have some good reason for this that they’re not sharing.” Nor can I say “Well, they’re entitled to their opinion.” This isn’t about opinion; it’s about facts.
I will continue to be a fanatic until the prohibitionists can make some kind of showing that they are both honest and well informed — something I don’t expect anytime soon.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Are they really that stupid?

Clarification on Raich opinion dates

Apparently the Supreme Court will not be releasing any opinions this Monday (May 2) after all. This means that the next possible date for decisions is Monday, May 16.
Via SCOTUSblog:

The remaining scheduled dates for issuance of opinions are May 16th, 23d and 31st, and each of the four Mondays in June. (If needed, the Court might add further dates between June 21st and June 30th.)

Here’s the Supreme Court Calendar (pdf).
I had earlier assumed that the May 2 and 16 dates were the last possibilities for Raich — given that there are only 4 cases left from the December arguments (Raich was argued Nov. 29 but that was part of the December arguments).
At this point, I have no idea how long the Court will take with Raich. I expected it before now. While it’s frustrating to continue waiting, I can only think that the delay is a positive thing.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Clarification on Raich opinion dates

Hempfest at Illinois State University

Tomorrow (Friday, April 29), M.A.S.H. (Mobilizing Activists and Students for Hemp) at Illinois State University will be holding their Spring Hempfest out on the quad, from noon until about 7 pm. Music, speakers, jewelry-making and just hanging out on the quad.
If you’re in the area, stop by. I’ll be speaking around 2:30 pm.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Hempfest at Illinois State University

More evidence that the prohibitionists are lying to you

Karen Tandy:

Over the past decade, drug policy in some foreign countries, particularly those in Europe, has gone through some dramatic changes toward greater liberalization with failed results. Consider the experience of the Netherlands, where the government reconsidered its legalization measures in light of that country’s experience.

Reality (Mayors Back Legalization of Cannabis):

Amsterdam — A majority of the mayors of the 30 largest Dutch cities support the legalisation of cannabis, backing a controversial call from Democratic Reform Minister Alexander Pechtold.

John Walters:

“The number of Americans admitted to hospital emergency wards because of marijuana use has doubled to 120,000 annually in the past five years,” said a recent news story in this newspaper, paraphrasing Mr. Walters at a Washington news conference.

Reality (NORML, via Cannabis News):

Louisville, KY: Use of cannabis is not independently associated with injuries requiring hospitalization, according to clinical data published in the March issue of the Journal of TRAUMA Injury, Infection, and Critical Care.

A research team at SUNY (State University of New York) Buffalo’s Department of Family Medicine conducted a logistical retrogression analysis of approximately 900 trauma patients with positive toxicology screens for drugs and alcohol. Authors found, “Alcohol and cocaine use is independently associated with violence-related injuries, whereas opiate use is independently associated with nonviolent injuries and burns. … Associations of positive toxicology test results for … cannabis … with injury type, injury mechanisms, and outcomes were not statistically significant.”

NORML Senior Policy Analyst Paul Armentano said that the findings countered allegations from the Drug Czar’s office that cannabis use is a leading “factor in emergency room visits.”

Armentano said: “Among trauma patients requiring hospitalization, cannabis is rarely mentioned independent of other drugs. More importantly, cannabis use alone is not associated with the sort of serious or violent injuries that are typically correlated with the use of alcohol and cocaine – two substances that, unlike marijuana, often increase aggressive or risk-taking behavior among users.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on More evidence that the prohibitionists are lying to you

Stop Prisoner Rape

I received a note from Andrea Cavanaugh, the public outreach associate for Stop Prisoner Rape, a national human rights organization.

Stories from Inside

SPR is launching a groundbreaking new project built around firsthand accounts of sexual assaults against inmates held on drug charges.

Stories from Inside will examine how the “war on drugs” and three-strikes laws have exacerbated prison overcrowding and led to a dramatic increase in prisoner rape. When it is released to the public, the project will help shatter stereotypes about prisoner rape and the commonly held perception that drug defendants “get what they deserve” while in custody.

SPR is seeking non-violent drug offenders who are survivors of prisoner rape and who are willing to participate in the project.

If you are willing to participate, contact Andrea.
For more background, please read this feature at the Drug War Chronicle. It’s an eye-opener.
And remember (paraphrasing William F. Buckley): Even if one takes every allegation of the prohibitionists at face value, drug prohibition has done far more harm to far more people than drugs ever could.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Stop Prisoner Rape

Surreal Reading…

“bullet” DEA’s Karen Tandy is speaking out. This release from the DEA has her article: “Marijuana: The Myths Are Killing Us,” which appeared in the March issue of Police Chief Magazine.
She starts by using the death of a 14-year-old girl who may have died from ecstacy and whose friends were afraid to get help becuase they might get in trouble as a way to attack medical marijuana efforts! This is the lowest of the low — and she got it directly from Mark Souder. I just wonder if Irma Perez’ sister is aware of how these drug warriors are using her.
Then in the usual guise of “exposing myths,” she procedes to spread some of the most atrocious lies about marijuana. It’s all the same old stuff.
Now maybe you think that Karen Tandy, as head of the DEA, would be an expert on medical marijuana. Let’s go back a bit to her confirmation hearing. Senator Durbin asked:
A picture named 0309071550.jpg

Durbin:Are you aware of information regarding the medicinal benefits of marijuana (for example: an editorial in the New England Journal of Medicine on [January] 30, 1997; the 1999 Institute of Medicine report “Marijuana and Medicine: Assessing the Science Base authorized by the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy; and the 1988 ruling from the DEA’s chief administrative law judge, Francis L. Young)?…”[links added]

Tandy:“I am not personally familiar with the sources you cite discussing the putative “medicinal benefits of marijuana…”

Idiot.
“bullet” Visiongain Report Announces Cannabinoids as a Potential Blockbuster
This is just bizarre to read. Speculation on how many millions of dollars will be generated by different cannabinoid-based drugs being developed world-wide in matter-of-fact financial guidance

Visiongain values the current cannabinoid market in 2005 at $110.5 million. This value is the combined world revenues of Marinol, Nabilone and also includes generic Dronabinol in Germany. This is a 6.3% growth increase from 2004, where revenues totalled $104 million. By 2010 sales of these products could reach a potential of just under $200 million. Over the forecast period, 2002 to 2010, this will generate a CAGR% of 10.76%.

By 2006 the cannabinoid market is expected to develop from the limited, controversial, niche market of today, to that with a much higher profile with additional approved therapeutic areas.

I read both of these items this morning and my head just about exploded.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Surreal Reading…

Tell the truth, lose your job

Some of you may remember my report on the recent circus in Alaska where politicians sought to out-do themselves coming up with bogus information and outright lies about marijuana — part of an attempt by Alaska Governor Murkowski to over-ride the state’s constitution and claim that marijuana has somehow become extraordinarily dangerous. The one sane voice then — Barbara Brink, head of the public defenders agency, who testified against the bill.
Now it’s reported that Gov. Murkowski won’t be reappointing her.
Somebody get this jerk governor a job in the private sector. The only words I want to hear from him are “Do you want fries with that?”
Related: If you can get through Anchorage Daily News’ annoying registration process, there’s a cute satirical piece about the subject – a “what if Murkowski tried to ban wine” speculation.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Tell the truth, lose your job

Raich Speculation

Again today, the Supreme Court Justices released their opinions and Raich v. Ashcroft wasn’t there.
Now there’s nothing that requires them to release their opinion on a certain date or in a certain order, but they will need to finish up by June (and there’s only 2 more days coming up in which they’ll release opinions: May 2 and 16) [correction: May 16 is now the next possible date, but there are a number of other dates after that]. And there are only a few cases left from the December session (Raich was argued November 29, which was considered the first day of the December session).
Now there could be many uninteresting technical reasons for Raich to be so late, but I thought we could take this time while we’re waiting to do some wild speculating just for fun. So here’s a few of mine:

  1. It’s a very close decision, and it’s taken a lot of internal wrangling to create a majority coalition. The decision will end up 5-4 with some concurring in part and dissenting in part.
  2. The Chief Justice has a strong interest in states’ rights, and therefore wanted to have significant input, but his illness has made that difficult to do in a timely manner.
  3. The Justices have been taking the time to do extra research on medical marijuana and how the government’s FDA approval processes work to understand why it hasn’t gone that route.
  4. The Justices have decided to carve out a specific states’ rights area for medical marijuana (using something like Barnett’s “state sub-class” concept or Kreit’s “economic enterprise” approach) and they’re taking the time to make sure they understand what other areas this new case law will impact.
  5. The Justice writing the majority opinion understands that this will be considered a landmark case in the future, and is taking additional time writing it to make it beautifully written and constructed as well.
  6. The Justices are making a strong case for states rights in Raich (thereby reducing the power of Congress) and want to take the extra time to include some witty rebukes at those in Congress who have been agitating against the Judiciary. (OK, that’s just real wishful thinking on my part)

Now maybe it’s my cockeyed optimism showing through, but in all my scenarios it looks pretty good for Raich (and certainly not a slam dunk for the government).
What do you think? Got any speculations of your own?

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Raich Speculation