Glenn Greenwald has a very strong piece: The growing menace of domestic drones
Whatever else is true, the growing use of drones for an increasing range of uses on U.S. soil is incredibly consequential and potentially dangerous, for the reasons I outlined last week, and yet it is receiving very little Congressional, media or public attention. Itâ€™s just a creeping, under-the-radar change. Even former Congresswoman Harman […] has serious concerns about this development: â€There is no question that this could become something that people will regret,â€ she told the LA Times. The revelation that a Predator drone has been used on U.S. soil this way warrants additional focus on this issue.
There is always a large segment of the population that reflexively supports the use of greater government and police power â€” itâ€™s usually the same segment that has little objection to Endless War â€” and itâ€™s grounded in a mix of standard authoritarianism (I side with authority over those they accused of being Bad and want authorities increasingly empowered to stop the Bad people) along with naivetÃ© (I donâ€™t really worry that new weapons and powers will be abused by those in power, especially when â€” like now â€” those in power are Good). This mindset manifests in the domestic drone context specifically by dismissing their use as nothing more than the functional equivalent of police helicopters. This is a view grounded in pure ignorance.
Glenn is one of the true voices sounding the alarm of authoritarianism, and understanding the mindset of those who would assume that power.
Itâ€™s beyond obvious that policy planners and law enforcement officials expect serious social unrest. Why wouldnâ€™t they: when has sustained, severe economic suffering and anxiety of the sort we are now seeing â€” along with pervasive, deep anger at the political class and its institutions â€” not produced that type of unrest? Drones are the ultimate tool for invasive, sustained surveillance and control, and one would have to be historically ignorant and pathologically naive not to understand its capacity for abuse.
So where do we go from here?
No matter oneâ€™s views, the escalating addition of drones â€” weaponized or even just surveillance â€” to the vast arsenal of domestic weapons that already exist is a serious, consequential development. The fact that it has happened with almost no debate and no real legal authorization is itself highly significant. One thing is for certain: this is a development that is going to continue and increase rapidly. It needs far more attention than it has thus far received.
Update: One answer: