Send comments, tips,
and suggestions to:
DrugWarRant
Join us on Pete's couch.
couch

DrugWarRant.com, the longest running single-issue blog devoted to drug policy, is published by the Prohibition Isn't Free Foundation
facebooktwitterrss
January 2010
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Archives

Authors

Marijuana Initiative likely to be on ballot in California

Supporters turned in more than 700,000 signatures today. That should be sufficient.

Signatures were to be submitted today to elections officials in all 58 California counties, who will then begin the process of validating that those who signed are registered voters. Only about 433,000 valid signatures are needed.

Full text of the initiative after the jump.

Changes California Law to Legalize Marijuana and Allow It to Be Regulated and Taxed. Initiative Statute.

Allows people 21 years old or older to possess, cultivate, or transport marijuana for personal use. Permits local governments to regulate and tax commercial production and sale of marijuana to people 21 years old or older. Prohibits people from possessing marijuana on school grounds, using it in public, smoking it while minors are present, or providing it to anyone under 21 years old. Maintains current prohibitions against driving while impaired. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: Savings of up to several tens of millions of dollars annually to state and local governments on the costs of incarcerating and supervising certain marijuana offenders. Unknown but potentially major tax, fee, and benefit assessment revenues to state and local government related to the production and sale of marijuana products.

Section 1: Name
This Act shall be known as the “Regulate, Control and Tax Cannabis Act of 2010.”

Section 2: Findings, Intent and Purposes
This Act, adopted by the People of the State of California, makes the following Findings and Statement of Intent and Purpose:

  1. Findings
    1. California’s laws criminalizing cannabis (marijuana) have failed and need to be reformed. Despite spending decades arresting millions of non-violent cannabis consumers, we have failed to control cannabis or reduce its availability.
    2. According to surveys, roughly 100 million Americans (around 1/3 of the country’s population) acknowledge that they have used cannabis, 15 million of those Americans having consumed cannabis in the last month. Cannabis consumption is simply a fact of life for a large percentage of Americans.
    3. Despite having some of the strictest cannabis laws in the world, the United States has the largest number of cannabis consumers. The percentage of our citizens who consume cannabis is double that of the percentage of people who consume cannabis in the Netherlands, a country where the selling and adult possession of cannabis is allowed.
    4. According to The National Research Council’s recent study of the 11 U.S. states where cannabis is currently decriminalized, there is little apparent relationship between severity of sanctions and the rate of consumption.
    5. Cannabis has fewer harmful effects than either alcohol or cigarettes, which are both legal for adult consumption. Cannabis is not physically addictive, does not have long term toxic effects on the body, and does not cause its consumers to become violent.
    6. There is an estimated $15 billion in illegal cannabis transactions in California each year. Taxing and regulating cannabis, like we do with alcohol and cigarettes, will generate billions of dollars in annual revenues for California to fund what matters most to Californians: jobs, health care, schools and libraries, roads, and more.
    7. California wastes millions of dollars a year targeting, arresting, trying, convicting, and imprisoning non-violent citizens for cannabis related offenses. This money would be better used to combat violent crimes and gangs.
    8. The illegality of cannabis enables for the continuation of an out-of-control criminal market, which in turn spawns other illegal and often violent activities. Establishing legal, regulated sales outlets would put dangerous street dealers out of business.
  2. Purposes
    1. Reform California’s cannabis laws in a way that will benefit our state.
    2. Regulate cannabis like we do alcohol: Allow adults to possess and consume small amounts of cannabis.
    3. Implement a legal regulatory framework to give California more control over the cultivation, processing, transportation, distribution, and sales of cannabis.
    4. Implement a legal regulatory framework to better police and prevent access to and consumption of cannabis by minors in California.
    5. Put dangerous, underground street dealers out of business, so their influence in our communities will fade.
    6. Provide easier, safer access for patients who need cannabis for medical purposes.
    7. Ensure that if a city decides not to tax and regulate the sale of cannabis, that buying and selling cannabis within that city’s limits remain illegal, but that the city’s citizens still have the right to possess and consume small amounts, except as permitted under Health and Safety Sections 11362.5 and 11362.7 through 11362.9.
    8. Ensure that if a city decides it does want to tax and regulate the buying and selling of cannabis (to and from adults only), that a strictly controlled legal system is implemented to oversee and regulate cultivation, distribution, and sales, and that the city will have control over how and how much cannabis can be bought and sold, except as permitted under Health and Safety Sections 11362.5 and 11362.7 through 11362.9.
    9. Tax and regulate cannabis to generate billions of dollars for our state and local governments to fund what matters most: jobs, healthcare, schools and libraries, parks, roads, transportation, and more.
    10. Stop arresting thousands of non-violent cannabis consumers, freeing up police resources and saving millions of dollars each year, which could be used for apprehending truly dangerous criminals and keeping them locked up, and for other essential state needs that lack funding.
    11. Allow the Legislature to adopt a statewide regulatory system for a commercial cannabis industry.
    12. Make cannabis available for scientific, medical, industrial, and research purposes.
    13. Permit California to fulfill the state’s obligations under the United States Constitution to enact laws concerning health, morals, public welfare and safety within the State.
    14. Permit the cultivation of small amounts of cannabis for personal consumption.
  3. Intent
    1. This Act is intended to limit the application and enforcement of state and local laws relating to possession, transportation, cultivation, consumption and sale of cannabis, including but not limited to the following, whether now existing or adopted in the future: Health and Safety Code sections 11014.5 and 11364.5 [relating to drug paraphernalia]; 11054 [relating to cannabis or tetrahydrocannabinols]; 11357 [relating to possession]; 11358 [relating to cultivation]; 11359 [possession for sale]; 11360 [relating to transportation and sales]; 11366 [relating to maintenance of places]; 11366.5 [relating to use of property]; 11370 [relating to punishment]; 11470 [relating to forfeiture]; 11479 [relating to seizure and destruction]; 11703 [relating to definitions regarding illegal substances]; 11705 [actions for use of illegal controlled substance]; Vehicle Code sections 23222 and 40000.15 [relating to possession].
    2. This Act is not intended to affect the application or enforcement of the following state laws relating to public health and safety or protection of children and others: Health and Safety Code sections 11357 [relating to possession on school grounds]; 11361 [relating to minors as amended herein]; 11379.6 [relating to chemical production]; 11532 [relating to loitering to commit a crime or acts not authorized by law]; Vehicle Code section 23152 [relating to driving while under the influence]; Penal Code section 272 [relating to contributing to the delinquency of a minor]; nor any law prohibiting use of controlled substances in the workplace or by specific persons whose jobs involve public safety.

Section 3: Lawful Activities
Article 5 of Chapter 5 of Division 10 of the Health and Safety Code, commencing with section 11300 is added to read:

Section 11300: Personal Regulation and Controls

  1. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, it is lawful and shall not be a public offense under California law for any person 21 years of age or older to:
    1. Personally possess, process, share, or transport not more than one ounce of cannabis, solely for that individual’s personal consumption, and not for sale.
    2. Cultivate, on private property by the owner, lawful occupant, or other lawful resident or guest of the private property owner or lawful occupant, cannabis plants for personal consumption only, in an area of not more than twenty-five square feet per private residence or, in the absence of any residence, the parcel. Cultivation on leased or rented property may be subject to approval from the owner of the property. Provided that, nothing in this section shall permit unlawful or unlicensed cultivation of cannabis on any public lands.
    3. Possess on the premises where grown the living and harvested plants and results of any harvest and processing of plants lawfully cultivated pursuant to section 11300(a)(ii), for personal consumption.
    4. Possess objects, items, tools, equipment, products and materials associated with activities permitted under this subsection.
  2. “Personal consumption” shall include but is not limited to possession and consumption, in any form, of cannabis in a residence or other non-public place, and shall include licensed premises open to the public authorized to permit on-premises consumption of cannabis by a local government pursuant to section 11301.
  3. “Personal consumption” shall not include, and nothing in this Act shall permit cannabis:
    1. possession for sale regardless of amount, except by a person who is licensed or permitted to do so under the terms of an ordinance adopted pursuant to section 11301;
    2. consumption in public or in a public place;
    3. consumption by the operator of any vehicle, boat or aircraft while it is being operated, or that impairs the operator;
    4. smoking cannabis in any space while minors are present.

Section 11301: Commercial Regulations and Controls
Notwithstanding any other provision of state or local law, a local government may adopt ordinances, regulations, or other acts having the force of law to control, license, regulate, permit or otherwise authorize, with conditions, the following:

  1. cultivation, processing, distribution, the safe and secure transportation, sale and possession for sale of cannabis, but only by persons and in amounts lawfully authorized;
  2. retail sale of not more than one ounce per transaction, in licensed premises, to persons 21 years or older, for personal consumption and not for resale;
  3. appropriate controls on cultivation, transportation, sales, and consumption of cannabis to strictly prohibit access to cannabis by persons under the age of 21;
  4. age limits and controls to ensure that all persons present in, employed by, or in any way involved in the operation of, any such licensed premises are 21 or older;
  5. consumption of cannabis within licensed premises;
  6. safe and secure transportation of cannabis from a licensed premises for cultivation or processing, to a licensed premises for sale or on-premises consumption of cannabis;
  7. prohibit and punish through civil fines or other remedies the possession, sale, possession for sale, cultivation, processing, or transportation of cannabis that was not obtained lawfully from a person pursuant to this section or section 11300;
  8. appropriate controls on licensed premises for sale, cultivation, processing, or sale and on-premises consumption, of cannabis, including limits on zoning and land use, locations, size, hours of operation, occupancy, protection of adjoining and nearby properties and persons from unwanted exposure, advertising, signs and displays, and other controls necessary for protection of the public health and welfare;
  9. appropriate environmental and public health controls to ensure that any licensed premises minimizes any harm to the environment, adjoining and nearby landowners, and persons passing by;
  10. appropriate controls to restrict public displays, or public consumption of cannabis;
  11. appropriate taxes or fees pursuant to section 11302;
  12. such larger amounts as the local authority deems appropriate and proper under local circumstances, than those established under section 11300(a) for personal possession and cultivation, or under this section for commercial cultivation, processing, transportation and sale by persons authorized to do so under this section;
  13. any other appropriate controls necessary for protection of the public health and welfare.

Section 11302: Imposition and Collection of Taxes and Fees

  1. Any ordinance, regulation or other act adopted pursuant to section 11301 may include imposition of appropriate general, special or excise, transfer or transaction taxes, benefit assessments, or fees, on any activity authorized pursuant to such enactment, in order to permit the local government to raise revenue, or to recoup any direct or indirect costs associated with the authorized activity, or the permitting or licensing scheme, including without limitation: administration; applications and issuance of licenses or permits; inspection of licensed premises and other enforcement of ordinances adopted under section 11301, including enforcement against unauthorized activities.
  2. Any licensed premises shall be responsible for paying all federal, state and local taxes, fees, fines, penalties or other financial responsibility imposed on all or similarly situated businesses, facilities or premises, including without limitation income taxes, business taxes, license fees, and property taxes, without regard to or identification of the business or items or services sold.

Section 11303: Seizure

  1. Notwithstanding sections 11470 and 11479 of the Health and Safety Code or any other provision of law, no state or local law enforcement agency or official shall attempt to, threaten to, or in fact seize or destroy any cannabis plant, cannabis seeds or cannabis that is lawfully cultivated, processed, transported, possessed, possessed for sale, sold or used in compliance with this Act or any local government ordinance, law or regulation adopted pursuant to this Act.

Section 11304: Effect of Act and Definitions

  1. This Act shall not be construed to affect, limit or amend any statute that forbids impairment while engaging in dangerous activities such as driving, or that penalizes bringing cannabis to a school enrolling pupils in any grade from kindergarten through 12, inclusive.
  2. Nothing in this Act shall be construed or interpreted to permit interstate or international transportation of cannabis. This Act shall be construed to permit a person to transport cannabis in a safe and secure manner from a licensed premises in one city or county to a licensed premises in another city or county pursuant to any ordinances adopted in such cities or counties, notwithstanding any other state law or the lack of any such ordinance in the intervening cities or counties.
  3. No person shall be punished, fined, discriminated against, or be denied any right or privilege for lawfully engaging in any conduct permitted by this Act or authorized pursuant to Section 11301 of this Act. Provided however, that the existing right of an employer to address consumption that actually impairs job performance by an employee shall not be affected.
  4. Definitions
    For purposes of this Act:

    1. “Marijuana” and “cannabis” are interchangeable terms that mean all parts of the plant Genus Cannabis, whether growing or not; the resin extracted from any part of the plant; concentrated cannabis; edible products containing same; and every active compound, manufacture, derivative, or preparation of the plant, or resin.
    2. “One ounce” means 28.5 grams.
    3. For purposes of section 11300(a)(ii) “cannabis plant” means all parts of a living Cannabis plant.
    4. In determining whether an amount of cannabis is or is not in excess of the amounts permitted by this Act, the following shall apply:
      1. only the active amount of the cannabis in an edible cannabis product shall be included;
      2. living and harvested cannabis plants shall be assessed by square footage, not by weight in determining the amounts set forth in section 11300(a);
      3. in a criminal proceeding a person accused of violating a limitation in this Act shall have the right to an affirmative defense that the cannabis was reasonably related to his or her personal consumption.
    5. “residence” means a dwelling or structure, whether permanent or temporary, on private or public property, intended for occupation by a person or persons for residential purposes, and includes that portion of any structure intended for both commercial and residential purposes.
    6. “local government” means a city, county, or city and county.
    7. “licensed premises” is any commercial business, facility, building, land or area that has a license, permit or is otherwise authorized to cultivate, process, transport, sell, or permit on-premises consumption, of cannabis pursuant to any ordinance or regulation adopted by a local government pursuant to section 11301, or any subsequently enacted state statute or regulation.

    Section 4: Prohibition on Furnishing Marijuana to Minors

    Section 11361 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:
    Prohibition on Furnishing Marijuana to Minors

    1. Every person 18 years of age or over who hires, employs, or uses a minor in transporting, carrying, selling, giving away, preparing for sale, or peddling any marijuana, who unlawfully sells, or offers to sell, any marijuana to a minor, or who furnishes, administers, or gives, or offers to furnish, administer, or give any marijuana to a minor under 14 years of age, or who induces a minor to use marijuana in violation of law shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for a period of three, five, or seven years.
    2. Every person 18 years of age or over who furnishes, administers, or gives, or offers to furnish, administer, or give, any marijuana to a minor 14 years of age or older shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for a period of three, four, or five years.
    3. Every person 21 years of age or over who knowingly furnishes, administers, or gives, or offers to furnish, administer or give, any marijuana to a person aged 18 years or older, but younger than 21 years of age, shall be punished by imprisonment in the county jail for a period of up to six months and be fined up to $1,000 for each offense.
    4. In addition to the penalties above, any person who is licensed, permitted or authorized to perform any act pursuant to Section 11301, who while so licensed, permitted or authorized, negligently furnishes, administers, gives or sells, or offers to furnish, administer, give or sell, any marijuana to any person younger than 21 years of age shall not be permitted to own, operate, be employed by, assist or enter any licensed premises authorized under Section 11301 for a period of one year.

    Section 5: Amendment
    Pursuant to Article 2, section 10(c) of the California Constitution, this Act may be amended either by a subsequent measure submitted to a vote of the People at a statewide election; or by statute validly passed by the Legislature and signed by the Governor, but only to further the purposes of the Act. Such permitted amendments include but are not limited to:

    1. Amendments to the limitations in section 11300, which limitations are minimum thresholds and the Legislature may adopt less restrictive limitations.
    2. Statutes and authorize regulations to further the purposes of the Act to establish a statewide regulatory system for a commercial cannabis industry that addresses some or all of the items referenced in Sections 11301 and 11302.
    3. Laws to authorize the production of hemp or non-active cannabis for horticultural and industrial purposes.

    Section 6: Severability
    If any provision of this measure or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of the measure that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this measure are severable.

Interesting. I’m a little unsure about the status of college students. We know that they will smoke pot. That’s a given. What will be their legal status? The bill makes it clear that it’s only legalizing pot for those 21 and over, but it appears to me to be silent about what happens to a 19-year-old who gives pot to a 19-year-old, or a 19-year-old who is caught with possession of pot, other than the fact that individual cities can regulate that all they want.

How do you read it?

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

17 comments to Marijuana Initiative likely to be on ballot in California

  • Dano

    While the bill is a good first step I think that the 21 and over provision is made to mirror current liquor laws and hopefully be more attractive to voters.

    Unfortunately under 21 use of marijuana could still be a criminal matter if the state and local jurisdictions want it that way. Hopefully local police won’t see it as their job to go out looking for kids at colleges now to keep their overtime hours high, but they are drug warriors and “that’s where the drugs are” will likely be their war cry.

    We’ll have to see how this omission would be rectified later, but in the meantime it is a step in the right direction. Looking forward to election day!

  • Paul

    It looks somewhat restrictive, but it is good enough. Its failings are in the concessions given to make the bill more passable, but in the end it will be a smack in the face to federal prohibition. Polls are looking pretty good right now.

    There will be a lot of people who say this initiative is unconstitutional because it conflicts with federal law, but it does not. California could throw out its entire criminal code tomorrow without conflicting with federal law. MJ will still be illegal according to the feds, but it’s their law, so let them enforce it.

    If you hear people making the argument that we should not pass constitutional laws, correct them. All we are really doing is repealing provisions of existing state law.

  • Ed Dunkle

    If this passes it will be a ginormous step. I still have a hard time believing it could actually pass.

    Jerry Brown is the presumptive Democrat running for governor, and I don’t see him inspiring a lot of passion in the voters. I have a feeling the youth vote will not turn out. But, it’s still early.

  • Paul

    Jerry Brown is easy to like. He is GOOD at it. He could surprise a lot of people, and he has a way of winding up on the right side of the right issues.

  • See how much your city and state can save on Taxing & legalizing Marijuana also.

    http://MarijuanaLobby.org

  • claygooding

    I hope this does pass,but if it makes it on the ballot,it will be another first for California. The first state to vote on taking one of their rights back away from the federal government,which has lost all concept of what a democracy is or rights are.
    It will take the complete flushing of the toilet we call congress to ever convince Washington that America is a democracy. They have become enamored with their own greed and desires and no longer even attempt too act like they are voting for their constituents. And only when we replace all of them,will their replacements realize that if you want to be a legislator,you better listen to your constituents.

  • kaptinemo

    (Chuckling) Oh, I can just hear the prohibs now: “The Children! The Children! Won’t anyone think about the CHIL-DRE-HE-HENNNNNNNN!”

    And of course, the answer is that the referendum is all about that. Namely, the usual American proclivity to make sure that if the baby can’t eat steak, the grown man must eat pablum.

    As a favorite author of mine wrote long ago, “I fail to see how a 30 year old moron can vote better than a 12 year old genius.” A person 18 or older can die for their country but can’t have a drink or a toke? Insulting, but there it is. It always comes down to age, not intelligence. An arbitrary compromise, but still unsatisfying.

    But at least California is moving in the right direction, and will serve as an example for the rest of the increasingly cash-strapped and revenue-hungry States. And the law can always be modified later.

  • …punished by imprisonment in the state prison for a period of three, five, or seven years

    Will these sentences be “mandatory” or allow discretion?

  • DraganVojnovic

    Is this initative directly (or indirectly) related to the Tom Ammiano bill introduced in February 2009? Are there other ballot initiatives such as this one that are likely to be on ballot?

  • truthtechnician

    I hope it passes, but I’m doubtful. Medical Marijuana barely passed, in large part due to appealing to compassion for the sick and dying.

    I think it will get around 40%, and might pass a second time around.

    The 21-over thing bothers me as well. Obviously, a necessary concession. None the less, it is a compromise that isn’t fair to make. Definitely burns all the 18-21 year old activists out there for drug law reform. Especially the ones who collected or gave signatures.

    When collecting signatures for this (I’m 22), most people my age didn’t want to sign it because of the age thing. Another big deterrent was medical marijuana itself. I can’t tell you how many people brushed by me saying “Marijuana’s already legal idiot, just go get your card.” Minorities were also by and large, against it. I’d say more than half the people who signed were white. I think this is because minorities tend to be religious and uneducated on these matters. But, just like with Prop 8, do not underestimate the minority majority here in California.

  • Duncan

    The numbers in favor of legalizing cannabis have expanded considerably since 1996.

    If the comments sections of the CA papers are any indication the Prop will pass with a ‘mandate’.

  • ezrydn

    DraganVojnovic,

    I read, right after committee passage, that Ammiano said he’d let his bill “simmer” and let the Proposition go forth. If it didn’t make it, then he’d resurect his bill. Makes sense. No reason to pull both barrels when one barrel might just work.

  • Hope

    Very interesting, Truthtechnician.

    And thank you for your work in gathering signatures.

    Good job.

  • Just me

    Hope Cali brings forth some sanity the rest of our nation can follow.

    This is NOT un constitutional in reguard to federal law. People just dont know. ALL states can throught out all laws complying with federal law . People seem to think federal law is god. We could all walk away from the feds and make them impotent. They are nothing without US . We give them power , we can just as easily take it away. Thats the beauty of the constitution.

    Educate people. Let them know they dont have to fear the feds . We can render them a toothless lion,clip those claws. RAWR! 🙂

  • Duncan

    Just me, I seem to recall some arcane history from the mid-1800s where there were a bunch of States that thought that way. IIRC they had their pee-pees spanked and are still part of the US.

  • Just me

    So duncan; Are you telling me that if our government should become so tyrranical that we cant live as free men, that we should just bow down and let them have their way with us? I hope not. Besides that was then, this is now.

    There are some good men and women in government but, the corruption is far beyond blatant. If people dont see it now, it because they are weakminded or choose not to. If all good men do nothing, we are in for some serious problems. Prohibition is just one example of how wrong our government is, of how it walk all over people.

    If you think the states cant do anything then please…tell me…what would you have us free people do?

    I will not accept that people are too weak to do anything. If that were true , we would already be living as slaves to the elite, maybe in some respects we already are. The way I see it there are those pushing us that direction to complete the job, the only thing stopping the is peoples will to be happy and free.

    People only have the power over you that you give them.

  • […] been amended since the last go-round. Here is another site that published the text more recently: Marijuana Initiative likely to be on ballot in California - Drug WarRant __________________ First rule of harvest: "No bud pluckt before its time." Irish's […]