Send comments, tips,
and suggestions to:
Join us on Pete's couch.
couch, the longest running single-issue blog devoted to drug policy, is published by the Prohibition Isn't Free Foundation
October 2008



Open thread

Happy Halloween! “bullet” Flex Your Rights and others have been protesting in Washington DC about the new random bag searches in public transportation. Their efforts (which are really about informing citizens of their rights) have been getting some good press. “bullet” Chicago taking a new direction in the war on drugs? at WindyPundit covers this […]

Do not watch this video

The Drug Czar goes to Michigan to speak out against medical marijuana. Watch at your own risk (I only made it to the one minute mark).

Use versus Abuse

There’s an interesting article in the Irish Examiner about a speech by Father Peter McVerry at an Addiction Training Institute conference.

The Jesuit priest, who has worked with homeless young people for 30 years, said he had seen the “devastation” caused by illegal drugs, particularly heroin and cocaine. “I spend much of my time helping […]

403 Forbidden

The dreaded “403 Forbidden” screen has been rearing its ugly head again sometimes when people attempt to leave comments. Please know that this has nothing to do with you. You are not forbidden! There’s a somewhat clunky commenting software that comes with this blogging system. The software has a built-in spam filter, and if it […]

Evil or Stupid

There are a lot of reasons for ordinary people to not get drug policy reform, particularly if they haven’t spent much time thinking about it or studying it. But there’s a point… You listen to a prohibitionist who spends a lot of time dealing with drug policy, and there’s a point when you realize that […]

Calvina Fay vs. Jack Cole

And the winner, in a knockout… There’s no point in me excerpting this one. Transform’s got the whole thing. Go read it. It made my day.

Signs of sickness in our society

“bullet” Via Radley Balko comes a letter from Kent Corbett – a Milwauke police detective and former SWAT officer – who defends the actions of police in the horrible raid on Mayor Cheye Calvo and his family (where the dogs were killed and the innocent family terrorized with no investigative work by the police). Corbett writes:

As a former S.W.A.T. team member and a current homicide detective with the Milwaukee police department, I must take issue with the tone of a paragraph in ‹The WeekŠ (September 1). The piece addresses the Cheye Calvo incident, in which police raided a Maryland mayor‰s home looking for drugs, killed his dogs, and restrained him and his mother-in-law. It turned out the man was innocent.
I have personally been involved in the execution of no-knock search warrants, the killing of dogs during those executions, and the investigations of numerous drug-related homicides and officer-involved shootings. Yes, no-knock warrants are issued to avoid the destruction of evidence such as drugs, but they are also issued to protect the officers executing those warrants. In addition, each warrant requires a judge‰s authorization, and obviously the available evidence satisfied the judge in this case.
Sorry if Calvo and his mother-in-law were ‹restrainedŠ for ‹almost two hours.Š Would you rather have them be comfortable for those two hours, and risk officers‰ lives and safety? Calvo should be able to understand what the officers did and why they did it.
Municipal police departments do fight a war on the streets of this country daily. This incident should not be considered overkill (to take a word from Reason‰s Radley Balko), but sound police tactics. As soon as some police administrator starts to second-guess the training and experience of the officers charged with doing these types of investigations, someone will get hurt or killed. Drug investigations are inherently dangerous, and so is the Monday-morning quarterbacking you are doing.
Kent Corbett
Milwaukee, Wis.

What kind of system allows such a malignant tumor to exist within our law enforcement ranks unchecked? This is such a perversion of America – a repudiation of everything for which we stand. Does Kent Corbett put out an American flag on national holidays? Does he know what it means?
“bullet” Here’s one that’s a little subtler, but a sickness nonetheless.

JOLIET — Assistant State’s Attorney Michael Knick, a member of the Drug Prosecution Unit, and administrative assistant, Kathy Kearney, the secretary supervisor for the unit, were recognized by the Illinois Metropolitan Enforcement Group Directors’ and Task Force Commanders’ Association, Will County State’s Attorney James Glasgow announced.
Knick and Kearney were honored for their work in processing 858 narcotics cases during 2007 and 2008. The conviction rate for these cases was 95 percent.
“I congratulate Mike Knick and Kathy Kearney on receiving this prestigious honor and for going above and beyond their duties to fight the war against drugs in Will County,” Glasgow said. “Mike and Kathy, along with my entire Drug Prosecution Unit, have worked tirelessly with the Metropolitan Area Narcotics Squad ( MANS ) and our local police departments over the past four years.
“The unit has seen a 50 percent increase in the number of search warrants granted to detectives who are conducting narcotics investigations.”

The sickness here is using the benchmark of quantity in dealing with drug issues (or criminal justice issues in general). And we see that far too often in campaigns for prosecutors and Attorneys General. All about the numbers of people prosecuted and the numbers of convictions achieved, like points in a basketball game.
In prosecuting, it takes more than scoring points to be a true success, and prosecution “points” are costly, both in terms of the financial cost to taxpayers of prison and prosecution, and in the effect on lives, sometimes innocent ones.
I would like to see a prosecutor running for office who says:

I was a good steward of your money and your trust. I made efficient use of jail time and prosecution resources to lock up the most dangerous criminals, while finding alternatives for non-violent criminals when possible. I refused to waste your tax dollars on cases that didn’t deserve to be in a courtroom, and I made extra effort to insure that innocent citizens were not convicted nor put through a damaging criminal justice process.

But I don’t hear that much. What I hear is prosecutors bragging about breaking scoring records, as if that means they get to go to the regional finals.


“I think it’s unconscionable that the medical use of marijuana is not legal. … We can do better”

Yes on Proposal 1.

He just doesn’t get it

Via TalkLeft, John McCain writes in the National Law Journal:

Terrorists are not the only threat to public safety. Lax enforcement policies, judges who legislate from the bench and lack of support for law enforcement personnel all continue to force our innocent citizens behind the barred windows of their homes and allow criminals to roam […]

Odds and Ends and thread

“bullet” Evan G at D’Alliance with Hey Mom and Dad: Thanks for the Dog covers the latest effort in causing long-term damage to developing the notion of a free society in our youth: renting drug dogs to sniff your teen’s bedroom and possessions.
“bullet” Alix at Art of the Possible has a detailed post on Meth and public policy: Yes, an article on the ups and downs of the alleged meth epidemic
A couple of points of interest in it. One, this delightful quote from the Oregonion on how to create a meth panic article

Start your article with an anecdote, preferably one about a user who testifies about how methamphetamine destroyed his life. Toss out some statistics to indicate that meth use is growing, even if the squishy numbers don‰t prove anything. Avoid statistics that cut against your case. Use and reuse the words ‹problemŠ and ‹epidemicŠ without defining them. Quote law enforcement officers extensively, whether they know what they‰re talking about or not. Avoid drug history except to make inflammatory comparisons between meth and other drugs. Gather grave comments from public-health authorities but never talk to critics of the drug war who might add an unwanted layer of complexity to your story.

And Two, what should be even more the focus of the article:

It was the Federal Drug Abuse Control Amendments of 1965 which actually made illegal production of speed a profitable business. Prior to that, ‹illicit speed labs had to compete with diverted legal tablets priced at wholesale as low as thirteen or fourteen tablets for a pennyšš 75 cents per thousand.Š After the government intervened, the amphetamines that even JFK once regularly took became harder to legally acquire, but they could still found on the streets.

That’s exactly why meth has what little popularity it has today. It is a byproduct of prohibition. In fact, it is a byproduct of particularly stringent prohibition. Illegal, yet easily diverted, and much safer, amphetamines would reduce the lure of meth.
It’s just like the often volatile alcohol stills that sprung up during the other prohibition.
“bullet” I’ve been meaning, and neglecting, to link to Lee’s article on Afghanistan over at HorsesAss: Chasing the Dragon in Afghanistan. Definitely worth a read.