Drug WarRant

In another story from Drug Sense:

MANCHESTER, NEW HAMPSHIRE — Comcast Cable has censored Granite Staters for Medical Marijuana ( GSMM ), prohibiting the group from purchasing airtime on the company’s cable system in New Hampshire, according to GSMM Campaign Coordinator Aaron Houston.æ Houston approached Comcast last month, asking to buy airtime for a television commercial, but he was denied without receiving any written material detailing the company’s reasoning.

When a Comcast representative informed Houston on December 1 of the company’s denial, the representative noted that officials in Comcast’s legal department had not viewed a specific television spot from GSMM, but the officials had denied the group based on its message about medical marijuana.æ After receiving a written request from Houston seeking an explanation, the representative said reasons for the denial would be sent to GSMM in writing.æ Then, on December 16, the same representative told Houston in a telephone call that Comcast’s legal department “doesn’t issue written explanations.” …

Interestingly, Comcast recently struck a deal with the Partnership for a Drug-Free America ( PDFA ).æ In October 2003, Comcast announced a three-year advertising pledge, valued at $50 million, allowing PDFA to increase exposure for anti-drug advertising on Comcast’s cable systems in 35 states.æ The deal constituted “the largest single upfront commitment of advertising from a major media company to The Partnership in the organization’s history,” according to a PDFA news release.

In an end of the year report, Supreme Court Justice Rehnquist ripped into the PROTECT Act — a federal law he said comes close to intimidating federal judges who hand down lighter sentences. He also blasted Congress for failing to adequately fund the judiciary.
Buried in this particular UPI report of Rehnquist’s year in review statement was the fact that in fiscal 2003, “criminal cases in trial courts hit a record 70,642, breaking a record set in 1932, one year before the 18th Amendment — the Prohibition Amendment — was repealed.”
Very interesting.

I had a great time the past week plus, visiting relatives. These were wonderful times with people I love who, by the way, are now almost unanimously behind drug war policy reform — I feel that I’ve had some impact there over the years.
I’m very proud of my Dad for recently asking the question of whether it’s time to look at non-criminal solutions to the drug problem when a judge was speaking at Kiwanis club (I think that was it).
So I continued to do my work informally, but now I’m back, and there’s a ton of stuff going on. It’ll take me a while to get completely caught up. Feel free to let me know if I’m missing anything major.
Here’s a few things to start with that have been reported well elsewhere.
“bullet” TalkLeft notes that cancer causes a change in Wisconsin politician Gregg Underheim‘s views of medical pot.
“bullet”TalkLeft reports on NORML’s 2003: The Year in Review for the top ten marijuana events of 2003.
The Austin Texas Chronical also had a Top 10 (or 8) Drug War Moments that were very interesting.
“bullet” Talkleft and Walter in Denver both had excellent comments on the ongoing controversy over the return of confiscated pot in Colorado. The judge has ordered it returned, the DEA refuses. A very interesting conflict, typical of the arrogance of the feds.
“bullet” The new Drug Sense Weekly has a number of items including:
There is a transcript available of John Walters’ brief appearance on CNN a couple of weeks ago. While it was primarily a puff piece, kudos to Catherine Callaway for catching the Drug Czar when he tried to lie and say that his own survey was the only one that counted.
“bullet” The new Drug War Chronicle issue, with loads of good articles, including the excellent:
In Farewell Report, Syracuse Auditor Examines Drug War, Finds It Wanting

The report had not started out as an indictment of the drug war, said Lewis. But as the numbers came in, they showed twice as many arrests for drug crimes as for any other offense — nearly one-third of them on marijuana charges. “We started looking at statistics for the Police Department because public safety is so important,” Lewis said. “But we were surprised to learn that twice as many people are arrested for drug-related incidents than for any other violation, and the violence in our neighborhoods is worse every year.”

The report did not just rely on statistics, Lewis said. “I went to many neighborhood meetings and I listened to people and talked to people,” Lewis said, “and they universally said they weren’t that concerned about others using drugs at home. It was the violence associated with drug sales on street corners that concerned them. If we made those drugs available in some other fashion, well, I don’t think we’d be spending $34 million a year to prevent people from smoking pot in their living rooms. Our policy today may be contributing to the violence, just as prohibition did for the last generation,” Lewis said.

“The police are a little concerned, but this is not an attack on the police,” Lewis clarified. “This is a question of public policy, and somebody has to ask the fundamental question: Why are these drugs illegal? When we talk about how we deal with this illegal drug or that one, we are dancing around the real question. We need to decriminalize drugs, and by that I don’t mean legalizing them but dealing with them from the medical approach, not the criminal justice approach. We need to be talking about treatment on demand, and maybe making some drugs available through harm reduction programs. We need a different approach than locking people up.”

The full report is supposed to be available soon at ReconsiDer.

I’ll be away visiting family over the next few days. And while our drug czar has not taken a vacation from his lies, I don’t feel like reporting his comments at this time. So I leave you with this tree and some reading suggestions.
Feel free to browse through the site and check out some of the longer articles, if you haven’t gotten to them yet, such as
Why is Marijuana Illegal, War on a Plant, and Frequently Asked Questions. For something on the lighter side, check out my parody Increase in Burger Abuse Seen.
For updates on any critical news regarding the drug war over the holidays, you can always check out TalkLeft.
Finally, for a special holiday treat, check out Susan Wells’ “A Drug War Carol.”

The federal law making possession of small amounts of marijuana illegal does not violate the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Canada’s top court says.
The Supreme Court of Canada ruled 6-3 Tuesday that jailing someone with small amounts is constitutional.
This means that marijuana policy reform is going to be up to the government, which has batted around various plans for decriminalization for some time (over the vocal objections of the United States Minister of Drug Policy Disinformation John Walters).
It all boils down to debates over what amount consists of decriminalized small possession (5-10-15 grams) and how much they’re going to jack up the penalties for dealers and growers to “balance” the decriminalization – a far cry from the Senate’s original call for legalization.
Update: From a dissent in the ruling by J. Deschamps (text of decisions available here).

The inclusion of cannabis in the schedule to the Narcotic Control Act infringes the accused’s right to liberty without regard for the principles of fundamental justice. For the state to be able to justify limiting an individual’s liberty, the legislation upon which it bases its actions must not be arbitrary. In this case, the legislation is arbitrary. First, it seems doubtful that it is appropriate to classify marihuana consumption as conduct giving rise to a legitimate use of the criminal law in light of the Charter, since, apart from the risks related to the operation of vehicles and the impact on public health care and social assistance systems, the moderate use of marihuana is on the whole harmless. Second, in view of the availability of more tailored methods, the choice of the criminal law for controlling conduct that causes little harm to moderate users or to control high-risk groups for whom the effectiveness of deterrence or correction is highly dubious is out of keeping with Canadian society’s standards of justice. Third, the harm caused by prohibiting marihuana is fundamentally disproportionate to the problems that the state seeks to suppress. This harm far outweighs the benefits that the prohibition can bring.

Where’s the Compassion by Doug Bandow at National Review Online.

But the drug laws are the real dangerous threats to public health and safety. The only way to protect the public is to guarantee the right of the sick to use marijuana and to stop jailing pot smokers who just want to get high.

The entire article is worth reading. A great overview of the current situation in the war, and the abject failure of the federal government.

The most common Google search referral that I get is the phrase ‘Why is marijuana illegal?’ Not a day goes by without that search term at least once, usually many more times than that.

Read Why is Marijuana Illegal?.

Via TalkLeft
Oh, and their companion, an Al Gore III, was also arrested.
Just three of the more than one million people arrested this year for simple possession charges.

Via Atrios, this CBS news report Feds Allege Youth Camps Abuse

Among the abuses uncovered: suicidal girls were stripped naked and placed in solitary confinement in a dark cell with only a drain for a toilet, boys were forced to run with mattresses strapped to their backs, girls who threw up while running in the heat were forced to eat their vomit, and youths were tied to poles or hog-tied….

According to a June letter from the Justice Department to Mississippi Gov. Ronnie Musgrove, investigators found the camps also lacked proper sanitation and educational services, and violated the youths’ First Amendment rights by “forcing them to engage in religious activities.”

The letter said youth were sometimes forced to get up in the middle of the night and walk around their dormitory with their hands on their head. Counselors were reported to have slapped and choked youths, and used pepper spray on them when they refused to exercise, or when they were tied up.

Further details and reports on these youth gulags, which were apparently not only tolerated by the state for many years, but actually encouraged as a form of “rehabilitation,” are available here and here.
Note that many of these youngsters are there for low level drug possession charges.
If you’re a parent, I ask you: Would you rather your child deal with the risks and temptations of drugs under your guidance and rules, or would you have them sent to a place like this?

Senator Proposes Taxing Illegal Drugs. This isn’t particularly new – 23 states have similar stupid laws.

Each gram of marijuana would be subject to a $3.50 tax.æ Other controlled substances would be taxed $200 for each gram or portion of a gram.æ For drugs not sold by weight, such as Ecstasy, every 50 doses would be taxed $2,000.

Note: for those of you who haven’t converted to metric yet, for marijuana that’s about $100 tax per ounce.
Keep in mind that this is not an easing of penalties — it is adding an additional penalty on top of criminalizing drugs. The idea is, once you’re arrested for possession of drugs, not only do you get the jail time and fines for the charge, but they also go after you for tax evasion because you probably haven’t bought the stamps (they don’t really expect you to).

A similar bill was passed in Kansas in 1987.æ Last year it collected $883,846 in revenue from people arrested in possession of drugs without stamps and $370 in stamp sales.

Most drug tax stamps are purchased by collectors, not drug dealers (the Texas one is quite entertaining).
These taxes are really a kind of dishonesty on the part of legislatures. If you want a tougher penalty for something illegal, then make that part of the legal penalty — don’t go around looking for some other hook.
Many of these taxes have run into legal trouble. Some of them have been termed unconstitutional due to the prohibition against self-incrimination. Others, if providing a serious enough penalty, have been determined to constitute double jeopardy (some Texas drug dealers in 1996 were getting off of their drug charges in court by putting a deposit down on their tax liability).
For now, those in St. Joseph, Missouri may want to spread the word that Republican Senator Charlie Shields wants to raise taxes. That could make it interesting.
Earlier this year, TalkLeft reported on a similar tax in Iowa. Protesters of the tax came up with the memorable line:

No taxation without legalization.