More fundraising – and odds and ends

A couple of days ago, I mentioned that Uribe was trying to get the international community to chip in some more money to magically end corruption and civil war.
One country has obviously taken notice… Afghanistan… and wants a piece of that action, too.

The international community is pumping hundreds of millions of dollars into anti-drug campaigns to train police units to destroy laboratories, arrest smugglers and destroy opium crops, as well as to fund projects to help farmers grow legal crops.
But Daud said that the United States and other nations must do more to help eradicate narcotics in Afghanistan, source of nearly 90 percent of the world’s opium and heroin, especially providing alternative sources of income for poppy farmers.
“In 2005, we were not satisfied and the farmers were not satisfied,” said Daud, the deputy interior minister and commander of a special anti-drugs force.

Yeah, everyone wants some more of that drug war money. Note the usual rhetoric: eradication, followed by some unspecified way to provide alternative sources of income to farmers. Of course, they rejected the one proposal that could have worked — the Senlis Council proposal to develop a legal use for the poppies in Afghanistan for medicine. But no other alternative income source so far has been effective.
“bullet” More on Colombia
Toby Muse just posted this article on his website: June 2005 Legalize Now! War-weary Colombia–and its Conservative Party–consider ending the drug war.
It’s a long article, but gives a fascinating and well-written look at the drug war in Colombia, and the challenges of the ever-growing movement toward decriminalization/legalization in that country, including that of the conservative party, which has come to realize that Colombia is getting all the damage of the drug war, with little of the benefits.
It’s amazing that there, as here, those who call for legalization are constantly being accused of being in the pay of the cartels — those who would be most opposed to legalization.
“bullet” Speaking of ignorant morons… for a really bizarre version of that kind of disconnect from reality here in the U.S., read Bruce Hanson’s strange screed.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on More fundraising – and odds and ends

Taking care of our elderly

An interesting category of drug criminal is appearing now and then — the very old.
For many, getting by financially can be a real challenge, with rising health costs, declining pensions, etc. and some of them have discovered that if they take only half of their pain pills and sell the rest, they can buy groceries.
And if they get caught, they can at least be philosophical about it and reckon that the jail will take care of their expenses for awhile (although many do not realize how severe the laws are).
Link

Since April 2004, Operation UNITE has charged more than 40 people 60 or older with selling drugs, primarily prescription medicine.

Because of the trend, local jails are having to bear the expense of caring for older inmates, who are often sickly.

“You’ve got to give them more attention,” said Floyd County Jailer Roger Webb. “It’s putting a strain on my deputies. We’re understaffed anyway. You’ve got to get them doctors and meet their medical needs.”

The latest conviction by this particular drug task force? An 87-year-old woman who pled guilty to receive 5 years prison, followed by 5 years probation, for selling to an undercover cop.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Taking care of our elderly

Join the Drug War Victims Union

Vin Suprynowicz at the Las Vegas Review-Journal has an interesting proposal — creating the International Brotherhood of Drug War Victims.
A picture named IBDWV.gif

What’s the sales pitch for joining and — in the case of those who can afford it — paying sizable dues into our new war chest?

Simple: Our freedom-hating, pain-loving War on Drugs depends on the tactic of “overcharging,” and then offering attractive deals — reduced charges, easier sentences — in exchange for guilty pleas. Fewer than 5 percent of all drug cases ever go to trial.

Again, the drug war depends on this — if every drug arrest led to a trial, the courts would be so swamped that some defendants couldn’t be scheduled for trial dates for many years into the future. Their attorneys could then win complete dismissal of all charges based on the violation of the constitutional right to a speedy trial.

So all members of our new union need to do is this: Agree to demand a jury trial. No plea bargains — no guilty pleas, ever. Otherwise, please don’t join. […]

What will the Fearless Drug Warriors do? Even with only 25 percent of drug defendants joining up and participating, trials that can now be started within a year will have to be scheduled at least three years into the future. The Drug Warriors will have no choice but to prosecute their “worst” cases first, turning at least two thirds of all drug defendants loose.

Of course, the article was done partly in fun, but it smartly points out another horrific aspect of the war on drugs. The war on drugs requires the use of a buffet of seemingly unconstitutional and outrageous penalties in order to scare citizens into giving up their constitutional right to a jury trial (to the point where many who are innocent are so terrified that they’ll plead guilty). This is because the system is so broken that actually allowing people to assert their constitutional rights would cause it to collapse under its own weight.
What kind of constitution requires its citizens to wager 10 or 20 years of their life in order to take advantage of its protections?

[thanks to Michael for the link]
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Join the Drug War Victims Union

Justice, Texas Style

Interesting interview at Alternet with reporter Nate Blakeslee, who has a new book: “Tulia: Race, Cocaine, and Corruption in a Small Texas Town.”

What does the story of Tulia reveal about the larger landscape of the national war on drugs?

I think it shows the decline in standards of law enforcement that has come along with the Byrne Grant task force program. And it’s not just in Texas; these grants are funding similar drug task forces in almost all rural and suburban areas in the United States.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Justice, Texas Style

Former Drug Czar Signs with CNN

According to TV Newser, William Bennett will join CNN as a “political analyst” (replacing Robert Novak as a high-profile conservative).
Bennett was the Drug Czar under George Bush the First, and is smooth talker and fact shaver known for taking a high moral position against drugs and just about anything else, as long as it isn’t Bill Bennett doing it (he turned out to be quite the gambler).
Current Drug Czar John Walters was chief of staff under Bennett (and learned his techniques well). The two of them even wrote a book together called “Body Count: Moral Poverty…and How to Win America’s War Against Crime and Drugs” (1996) – a thoroughly discredited piece of garbage that I actually slogged through. Nauseating.

[Thanks to Crooks and Liars]
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Former Drug Czar Signs with CNN

Fundraising for Drug War Dollars

Colombian President Uribe isn’t satisfied with the drug war money he’s gotten from the U.S. — now he’s putting out a fundraising pitch to the rest of the world:

Colombian President Alvaro Uribe has told the BBC the world must play a bigger role in helping his country combat illegal drugs and rebel groups.

“There are many countries helping us and there are many countries that do not help us yet,” the president said.

And how would the funds be used?

“I want to underline our determination to go to the jungle again … to destroy the illicit plantations that FARC has put within this national park,” he said.

Uribe told the BBC Colombians have a right to live in a country free of guerrillas, paramilitary groups, narcotics and corruption.

Yes, give us more money so we can be free of corruption.
Is Uribe stupid, or does he just think the rest of the world is?

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Fundraising for Drug War Dollars

What he said

Radley Balko: “Best. Botched. Drug Raid. Ever

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on What he said

Colorado Marijuana Initiative

I had heard that SAFER was putting forward a marijuana legalization measure on the state ballot for Colorado, and I had even read this ignorant and blantantly contradictory editorial in the Denver Post…
But then Scott sent me the link to this fabulous article by Alan Gathright, Rocky Mountain News. The kicker is provided by Law Enforcement Against Prohibition‘s Jack Cole, who gives all the reasons why prohibition (particularly aimed at marijuana is a bad idea and then..

When it comes to the SAFER initiative, Cole said, “we support them 100 percent.”

Colorado Attorney General John Suthers takes a sharply different view.

He said law enforcement doesn’t spend a great deal of resources prosecuting small pot-possession cases, and strongly opposes legalizing even small amounts of pot, calling it “a dangerous drug.”

Cole’s fellow LEAP members have given more than 1,400 talks against drug prohibition in the past two years.

“I would love to debate your attorney general,” he said.

“Let’s talk about what drugs are dangerous and what drugs aren’t: Cigarettes kill 430,000 a year in the United States.

“Alcohol kills 110,000 every year . . . But there has never been a recorded case of a death from ingesting marijuana.”

Paging Attorney General John Suthers…. Hello? Got a reply? Want to debate?

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Colorado Marijuana Initiative

S.W.A.T. – Then and Now

The Agitator reminds me that a new reality show is coming January 5 on A&E: Dallas SWAT.
Radley has been doing a great job pointing out how the SWAT mentality has been taking over this country, with even small towns having SWAT teams that end up killing innocents and/or using SWAT tactics for drug raids involving non-violent possession of marijuana.
And I’ve talked for some time about drug task forces and their tactics, and how busting into houses used to be reserved for situations where innocents were being threatened (like hostage situations) and has now become a regular tool of drug enforcement.
I’m sure all this will be glorified in the new show.
In fact, it reminded me that there was another S.W.A.T. television show back in 1975, so I took a look at the episode descriptions. In the 36 episode life of the show, only 3 even mentioned drugs, and none of them involved today’s middle-of-the-night break-down-the-door raids:

  • Episode 16 – Two officers go undercover to catch drug dealers.
  • Episode 22 – Hondo and a convicted dope dealer are stranded in rough terrain when syndicate thugs who want to keep him from testifying sabotage their helicopter.
  • Episode 32 – Lt. Eddie Chew is assigned to aid Lt. Hondo Harrelson when an elderly shop owner is fatally beaten by an illegal Chinese alien working as a shakedown man for Albert Parker, the Caucasian leader of what appears to be an all-Oriental crime syndicate, a deadly drug and protection ring. Hondo begins to doubt Chew’s integrity when it becomes obvious that Chinatown criminals are being given secrets of his investigation.

Most of the episodes involved real S.W.A.T. type hostage or terrorist situations, such as:

  • Episode 7 – A terrorist group takes a professional basketball team hostage and demands money.
  • Episode 8 – The team must find an elusive assassin who is unaware that he is spreading a deadly disease.
  • Episode 9 – …As Miss New Mexico tries on the crown and scepter, the armored car thieves attempt to steal the jewels, taking Susan and Miss New Mexico as hostages.
  • Episode 10 – Student protestors steal guns and seize control of a nuclear reactor.
  • Episode 17 – Street and his girl friend are trapped in a deserted movie studio planted with bombs by an embittered movie stuntman
  • Episode 25 – man steals a tugboat laden with explosives and threatens to blow up a famous marine biologist unless he is given a million dollars.
  • Episode 29 – The SWAT team protects a key government witness against an organized crime boss.
  • Episode 34 – A group of militants take over a radio station and demand that their jailed leader be released or they’ll blow it up.
  • Episode 35 – A mentally unbalanced veteran touring a movie studio suddenly thinks he is back fighting in Vietnam.

Now those are some good reasons to call in the S.W.A.T. team!
So what do we know about the upcoming Dallas SWAT show? Well, in the description, we see…

Ride shotgun as the team executes high-risk drug busts, apprehends murder suspects, searches for high-profile missing persons, and rescues hostages.

Notice the order of priority?
That’s right – Dallas SWAT cares more about busting pot smokers than saving Miss New Mexico (and Susan) from the Armored Car Thieves.
I wonder what percentage of the new show will be drug busts. Also, since it is a reality show, will they show when they bust down the door in a wrong-address raid and kill the homeowner? I’m guessing… probably not.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on S.W.A.T. – Then and Now

What we’ve always known about the Drug Czar…

He has no regard for the facts or the truth. Additionally, he is known for spinning the data to completely support administration policies.
I’ve already talked about the recent GAO report that took the Drug Czar and administrative policies to task for their lack of evidence that the drug war in Colombia is actually accomplishing anything.
Here’s an article that really goes after the Czar: “GAO: Data too fuzzy to measure drug war” by David Adams.
The following passages show just how shoddy the Drug Czar’s “reporting” is:

Critics of U.S. drug policy point to the GAO report as evidence that positive pronouncements by the drug czar’s office cannot be trusted. “What this report shows is that we need to take the government’s claims with a grain of salt, and a whole shaker in places,” said John Walsh, a drug expert at the Washington Office on Latin America, or WOLA, a private policy watchdog.

Walsh and others accuse the drug czar’s office of putting an overly favorable spin on the fuzzy data, as well as ignoring less positive news.

The drug czar’s office sat on a November 2004 report it commissioned by the Rand Corp., a California-based nonprofit research organization, which found that drugs were more available than ever and that prices had in fact fallen.

The drug czar’s office turned around and commissioned a second report from the Virginia-based Institute for Defense Analyses, which found prices were rising.

“They (the drug czar’s office) lack credibility unless they can explain such a wide difference,” said Peter Reuter, a University of Maryland drug expert who directed Rand’s research.

He noted that the Rand report was well documented and peer reviewed. Reuter said he was also “generally skeptical” of data in the IDA report. Accurate data takes months to compile, he said.

Other critics point to the IDA’s lackluster record in drug research, noting that it was dropped by the drug czar’s office in the 1990s after alleged flaws in its methodology.

Carnevale, who worked in the White House under three administrations and continues to support the war on drugs, accused Walters of trying to “simplify” data to meet preconceived beliefs. “He thinks the cocaine market is on the brink of collapse,” he said. “We are spending all this money so the price (of cocaine) must go up.”

Officials in the White House drug czar’s office did not return phone calls this week.

Nice to see this kind of scepticism — something that’s only really surfaced strongly in the media in recent years — thanks to John Walters’ outrageous behavior.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on What we’ve always known about the Drug Czar…