Drug WarRant

Excellent and powerful OpEd by Arthur Rizer and Joseph Harman in The Atlantic: How the War on Terror Has Militarized the Police

The most serious consequence of the rapid militarization of American police forces, however, is the subtle evolution in the mentality of the “men in blue” from “peace officer” to soldier. This development is absolutely critical and represents a fundamental change in the nature of law enforcement. The primary mission of a police officer traditionally has been to “keep the peace.” Those whom an officer suspects to have committed a crime are treated as just that – suspects. Police officers are expected, under the rule of law, to protect the civil liberties of all citizens, even the “bad guys.” For domestic law enforcement, a suspect in custody remains innocent until proven guilty. Moreover, police officers operate among a largely friendly population and have traditionally been trained to solve problems using a complex legal system; the deployment of lethal violence is an absolute last resort.

Soldiers, by contrast, are trained to identify people they encounter as belonging to one of two groups — the enemy and the non-enemy — and they often reach this decision while surrounded by a population that considers the soldier an occupying force. Once this identification is made, a soldier’s mission is stark and simple: kill the enemy, “try” not to kill the non-enemy. Indeed, the Soldier’s Creed declares, “I stand ready to deploy, engage, and destroy the enemies of the United States of America in close combat.” This is a far cry from the peace officer’s creed that expects its adherents “to protect and serve.”

Study: Whites More Likely to Abuse Drugs Than Blacks

Black youth are arrested for drug crimes at a rate ten times higher than that of whites. But new research shows that young African Americans are actually less likely to use drugs and less likely to develop substance use disorders, compared to whites, Native Americans, Hispanics and people of mixed race.

Obama unwise to ignore marijuana petition

Nicely done OpEd by Junior Ian Huyett at Kansas State.

Nice to see the DOJ take a little heat in Congress. Thanks to Rep. Steve Cohen.

The Justice Department again came under fire for its enforcement of marijuana laws Wednesday, as a Democratic House member pressed Laurie A. Robinson, Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Justice Programs, on the level of DOJ grant funds that are used to enforce those statutes.

“Marijuana is not the problem,” Rep. Steve Cohen (D-Tenn.), said at a House Judiciary subcommittee on crime, terrorism and homeland security oversight hearing. “It’s turning a whole generation of young people against the system and that’s something we can’t afford.”

Robinson said her office would look into how many Byrne law enforcement grants are used to reimburse local law enforcement agencies for enforcement of cannabis possession laws.

Cohen pressed Robinson to justify the federal government’s role in encouraging the enforcement of laws that the congressman said disproportionately affects people of color and tarnishes the records of young people for their entire lives.

Congressman’s Daughter Seeks Injunction Against Federal Crackdown on Medical Marijuana

Daughter has cancer and finds marijuana to be the best relief for chemo nausea. Her Congressman father says he supports his daughter, but opposes her ability to get her medicine legally. I find that incomprehensible.

Those looking for a serious answer from the White House “We The People” petitions have now been joined by another disgruntled group of answered petitioners – those looking for verification of government knowledge of extra-terrestrials.

Searching for ET, But No Evidence Yet

Of course, the government denied any knowledge, and I’m not a real follower of this topic, so can’t address whether or not the government’s response was outrageously and clearly wrong like it is on marijuana.

And maybe it’s my closeness to the subject, but doesn’t it seem like the government actually gave a more serious and respectful answer to the question of ET than that of MJ?

Does the government find UFO’s less worthy of derision than pot?

Sure seems that way.

My new favorite petition at the White House:

We demand a vapid, condescending, meaningless, politically safe response to this petition.

Since these petitions are ignored apart from an occasional patronizing and inane political statement amounting to nothing more than a condescending pat on the head, we the signers would enjoy having the illusion of success. Since no other outcome to this process seems possible, we demand that the White House immediately assign a junior staffer to compose a tame and vapid response to this petition, and never attempt to take any meaningful action on this or any other issue. We would also like a cookie.

(already has 7,000 votes)

Drug cops log Nigerian star’s 24 bowel movements: Law made to look an ass

Nigerian authorities have been forced to release an actor they suspected of drug smuggling after he produced no less than 24 narco-free bowel movements.

Babatunde Omidina, better known in Nollywood circles as Baba Suwe, was nabbed at Lagos airport last month by officers from Nigeria’s National Drug Law Enforcement Agency.

Officers pulled in the comedian, who was en route to Paris, on suspicion of drug trafficking after a body scan suggested he had ingested a quantity of contraband.

The drugs authorities decided to let the law, and nature, take its course, spending the next three weeks minutely examining Omidina’s bowel movements for evidence of the contraband. […]

In a final effort to unearth the alleged contraband, Omadina was last week subjected to 12 hours of “tests” at a Lagos hospital, apparently without his consent.

“All his systems were flushed, other than his lungs and intestines, but nothing was found,” his lawyer told a court hearing last week

So determined that they were right that they would subject a human being to that. The drug war acts, at times, like a mental illness.

Meanwhile, the actor’s lawyers said they plan to sue the agency for “billions” of naira.

I have no idea what “naira” are, but I hope they get many billions.

D.E.A. Squads Extend Reach of Drug War by Charlie Savage, New York Times

The D.E.A. now has five commando-style squads it has been quietly deploying for the past several years to Western Hemisphere nations […]

The evolution of the program into a global enforcement arm reflects the United States’ growing reach in combating drug cartels and how policy makers increasingly are blurring the line between law enforcement and military activities, fusing elements of the “war on drugs” with the “war on terrorism.” […]

Because the presence of armed Americans on their soil raises sensitivities about sovereignty, some countries that have sought the assistance of the United States will not acknowledge it, and the D.E.A. is reluctant to disclose the details of the commando teams’ deployments.

The complete dismantling of the DEA would be one of the best things we could do for this world.

Via Buzzfeed, some absolutely amazing photos of hummingbirds taken by Jeff Scheetz.

The always excellent Hungarian Civil Liberties Union has videotaped the opening session speakers from the conference, and has them available here, including:

• Gavin Newsome, California Lieutenant Governor “We Need Stronger Leadership to End it”
• Gary Johnson, former New Mexico Governor and Presidential candidate “Pardon Non-Violent Marijuana Offenders”
• Pete White, Co-Director of the L.A. Community Action Network “The War on Drugs Failed Our Communities”
• Alice Huffman, President, California NAACP
• Ethan Nadelmann, Executive Director of DPA “Prosecutors Are Out of Control”

It’s the 5th of November — the Guy Fawkes Gunpowder Treason and Plot day. That particular story has very little personal interest to me except as an historical oddity.

On the other hand, the date came alive again to me recently as I re-watched the really outstanding movie V for Vendetta

The film focuses on V, a shadowy hero/freedom fighter/terrorist, who uses the memory of Guy Fawkes Day as one of the tools to foment a revolution against a totalitarian government.

When a government, or aspect of government, moves toward totalitarianism, seeing no limits to its authority nor any reason to defer to science or facts, and when that government attempts to control the population through misinformation, it is the responsibility of the population to revolt.

The first step is waking them up.

How did this happen? Who’s to blame? Well certainly there are those more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but again truth be told, if you’re looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror. I know why you did it. I know you were afraid. Who wouldn’t be? War, terror, disease. There were a myriad of problems which conspired to corrupt your reason and rob you of your common sense. Fear got the best of you, and in your panic you turned to the now high chancellor, Adam Sutler. He promised you order, he promised you peace, and all he demanded in return was your silent, obedient consent.

Unlike with Guy Fawkes, waking up the population doesn’t mean you need to blow up parliament. I’m a firm believer in finding non-violent means of provoking change. It can seem to take longer, but it also may, in fact, be the only way to actually accomplish the task.

Once the population wakes, a totalitarian-shaped government function may ironically actually help the revolution succeed.

What I found particularly interesting in “V for Vendetta” were the actions of the totalitarian leader Adam Sutler, portrayed compellingly by John Hurt. Once threatened by the awakening of the masses, Sutler reacted (step by step precisely as predicted by V), cracking down more forcefully, leading to incidents that further angered the population, until his demise ultimately came as a byproduct of his own tyranny.

In a way, a similar kind of effect is seen today with the DEA crackdowns on medical marijuana and other similar actions. And it is, perhaps, inevitable. Oddly, once the public objects to totalitarianism, often the only way totalitarians know how to respond is to crank it up even more out of fear of losing power.

When it comes to the drug war, we’ve seen the public begin to wake (slowly, but inexorably). This has caused the drug warriors to double down in an attempt to maintain their power. This leads to incidents and outrages that we can use to help grab the attention of more people who may have only peripherally cared about drug policy. And so on.

People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people.

Interesting article in the Chicago Sun-Times, mostly notable for the fact that I have rarely seen, in a mainstream publication, the mention of marijuana as a connoisseur item (at least, other than in Oakland).

“It’s like a fine glass of wine where you twirl it, swish it in your mouth. You savor it,” Kate said. “Some kinds are evergreen-smelling. Some are orangey, sticky. We like to try different strains and compare.”

At the international reform conference yesterday, Gary Johnson talked about removing marijuana from Schedule 1 and pardoning non-violent marijuana offenders.
Continue reading →

Wrong.

Meet Real ID, as described by the ACLU in The Slow, Quiet Death of Real ID

The Real ID Act of 2005 is a federal law, and, as a federal law, supersedes state law.

If fully implemented, the law would facilitate tracking of data on individuals and bring government into the very center of every citizen’s life. As happened with Social Security numbers decades ago, use of such ID cards would then quickly spread and be used for other purposes — from work to voting to gun ownership. Other groups opposed Real ID because of its high cost (more than $23 billion by initial government estimates), cumbersome bureaucracy and impact on religious minorities.

Because of all these problems instead of compliance, Real ID faced widespread opposition. States rebelled. They had already taken steps to strengthen licenses after 9/11 and Real ID would undo that in favor of an expensive one-size-fits-all federal solution. So instead 25 states, either through a statute or legislative resolution, rejected Real ID. In fact, in 15 states it is actually illegal for state officials to comply with the federal law.

Wait. States actually passed legislation saying not to follow federal law? Yes.

So the feds cracked down, right?

No. It would be too unpopular and expensive to do so.

So instead DHS has chosen to postpone implementation over and over again. The final implementation date has been moved from May 2008 to December 31, 2009, then May 11, 2011 and is now January 2013. DHS itself acknowledges the moribund state of the law. DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano has said as much and the department also has only four full time employees working on Real ID

Naturally, it’s harder to derail something as entrenched as federal drug policy, but it does go to show that the will of the people and the states still have power even against a powerful federal government that unreasonably wishes to push a misguided legislative agenda.