Framing US drug enforcement as a war creates an excuse to upend self-governing customs that protect human rights. Part of prohibitionâ€™s survival strategy encourages rights violations when it enlists laws to shield drug war ideologies from critics.
Nothing is perfect, including ideologies. Confronted by imperfections, some ideologues panic. They fanatically defend their own fact-free ideological social identities. Some of the more crazed idealists even launch wars to reach the unreachable reality of their idealâ€”for example, a drug-free society.
One of the drug warâ€™s ideological lynchpins was ushered into existence during the Reagan era formation of the ONDCP with the help of then-Senator Joe Biden. In addition to Mr. Biden coining the term drug czar, a new and peculiar statutory clause blocked or bottlenecked federal research funding that might prove the government wrong in its declarations of the dangers of schedule I substances. A Controlled Substances Act (CSA) stipulation authorizes, if not encourages, researchers and drug enforcement officials to misrepresent the physical effects of marijuana and other medicinally useful schedule I substances:
The Director shall ensure that no Federal funds appropriated to the Office of National Drug Control Policy shall be expended for any study or contract relating to the legalization (for a medical use or any other use) of a substance listed in schedule I of section 202 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 812) and take such actions as necessary to oppose any attempt to legalize the use of a substance (in any form) that is listed in schedule I of section 202 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 812); and has not been approved for use for medical purposes by the Food and Drug Administration.
Ideally, ideologies shouldnâ€™t exist within viable legal systems. Ideals ordinarily donâ€™t represent reality. Neither should laws entangle citizens who reject anti-drug ideologies, or disavow people preferring thoughtful persuasions that might otherwise guide citizens to pursue their own best health and happiness.
Mr. Bidenâ€™s ideals encourage governments to publish disinformation about controlled substancesâ€”propaganda that can turn deadly. His habit of pandering to drug enforcement will harm his chances in 2020 should the arch drug-war-architect run for president.
In Joe Bidenâ€™s 2017 e-bookâ€”likely published in anticipation of a presidential runâ€”scanning for the words â€˜marijuanaâ€™ or â€˜cannabisâ€™ produces no results. Much is said instead of his son Beau Bidenâ€™s untimely death from brain cancer, and the conventional and experimental, non-cannabinoid drugs Beau received.
The Biden memoir also links illegal drugs to the existence of non-drug crimes. Mr. Biden boasts of how he helped put 100,000 new police officers on the streets and how much it reduced crime. No mention is made of the resultant overcrowded prisons holding drug war convicts, nor the lives of US citizens and internationals wasted in a bloody and pointless conflict targeting the use of benign and useful medicinal substances.
If Democrats aim to give Joe Biden a shot at being president in 2020, they might take a few moments to disable prohibitionâ€™s pivotal war propaganda vehicleâ€”the cited schedule I drug research exclusion clause. The CSA language threatens Mr. Bidenâ€™s political campaign. The clause is toxic enough to threaten any political entity refusing to abolish it.
A healthier, brighter and more peaceful future is possible as more voters choose to support political candidates and legislators favoring laws assuring truthful drug and chemical information is made freely available to American citizens and the world.