Drug WarRant

I hope you’re all excited and ready to vote tomorrow. Even if the options aren’t the greatest, try to find one good reason to vote for or against someone or some issue. You don’t have to vote for all of the races — you can leave some blank (I really wish you could vote “None of the Above”), but find that one race or issue where there is a difference and vote enthusiastically.
For suggestions, there are a number of good sources:

• Drug WarRant’s voting Wiki is still in development (probably won’t hit its stride until 2008), but has some outstanding information for Alaska, Maryland, and others.
• thehim has an addresses voting issues in this week’s Drug War Roundup
• Drug War Chronicle has an excellent detailed overview.
• Cannabis Culture has the 2006 Stoner Voters Guide

Of course, in many parts of the country, there are some easy ones for drug policy reformers. If you live in Nevada (marijuana legalization), Colorado (marijuana legalization), or South Dakota (medical marijuana), you already know you need to get everybody out to vote for the initiatives on the ballot. Stop being afraid to talk about it and call all your friends this evening to go vote tomorrow.
If you’re in Alabama, you’ll of course be writing in the name of Loretta Nall for Governor.
There are other races around the country deserving of attention. Check the guides above.
And then there’s Congress. I can’t emphasize enough how important it is to divide the government right now, and to get some of these sado-moralists off committee chair positions. The best way to do that is to elect a Democratic Congress. Sure, we might have to throw those bums out in two years, but right now we must at least provide some checking of the headlong rush towards authoritarianism. The drug war is a convenient tool in authoritarian movements, and will only be expanded, if the current “Republican” leadership is allowed to continue holding all branches. (I use “Republican” in quotes because the current Republican leadership is a betrayal of traditional conservative principles of limited government and fiscal and individual responsibility.)
So this is what I need you to do. If you vote for no other race at all, at least look for the one marked U.S. House of Representatives, and vote for the Democrat. Is the idiot you’re voting for any good? Unlikely. But that’s not what you’ll be voting for — you’re voting to reduce the power of Mark Souder and James Sensenbrenner, and yes, even the Drug Czar himself (imagine how the Congressional oversight hearings of the ONDCP would change with Democrats in charge of the committees).
OK, if you’re in Texas’s 14th District, vote Republican for the House, but the rest of you can vote against the Republicans.
And please, any of you in the 11th District in Illinois…. help me vote Jerry Weller out of office!
Vote!

Scott Morgan at StoptheDrugWar.org found this fascinating thing, and it deserves to be circulated:
The makers of Marinol are actually marketing their product on Google as “Legal Marijuana.” If you search for Legal Marijuana in Google, you’ll see this:

As Scott says:

Drug warriors such as Andrea Barthwell and David Murray have argued strenuously that cannabinoid-based pharmaceuticals such as Marinol and Sativex are completely different from marijuana. They’ve bristled at Rob Kampia’s claims that Sativex is “liquid marijuana” and they’ve long used the availability of Marinol as an excuse to arrest patients who prefer cultivated marijuana instead.

Of course, the drug companies want to use the law to insure that you use (and pay for) their marijuana, as opposed to the better stuff you can grow in your back yard.

As an update to the Colombia government’s mock attack on Kate Moss for destroying their country by using cocaine(!), I particularly like Kerry Howley’s take at Reason
Which goes something like this:
We should buy lingerie to support Kate Moss, so she can afford to buy more cocaine, thus providing income to the poor farmers in Colombia. If the Colombian government chooses to turn the profits from their biggest export over to criminals, that’s their problem.

OK, read this and explain to me why we’re eradicating the poppies…

Last week, British diplomats warned that an Afghan government program to eradicate opium poppy growing in Helmand province where 4,200 British troops are based, was likely to trigger heavy fighting.
The Afghan government will begin the campaign against the drug lords as early as next month, destroying poppy fields across the province. Helmand Governor Engineer Daoud is determined to carry out a program of “targeted eradication against the big boys who are growing on government land,” according to a British diplomat.
Taliban funds come not from cultivating the poppies but from providing protection to the drug lords, he said. The Taliban will therefore attack anyone trying to wipe out the poppy crop. [emphasis added]

So the Taliban are not profiting from the sale of the drug, but rather through our threats and efforts to eradicate it.
Could we be any more stupid?
Spend lots of taxpayer money to pursue a drug war that alienates the people, funds our enemies, and still doesn’t make a dent in drug availability.
This is policy as crafted by the Marketing Division of the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation. *

Same old story. This business with Ted Haggard is becoming practically a routine event. Big shot moralist loves to tell everyone else what not to do… while doing it.
Of course, Haggard said he threw the meth away that he bought and only got a massage from the male prostitute.
Right.
I am so sick and tired of the stench of moral hypocrisy in this country.

Via the South Dakota for Medical Marijuana blog, comes this story

RAPID CITY — Two Steven High School seniors who wore t-shirts to school advocating the passage of Initiated Measure 4, the medical marijuana ballot issue, SAY their rights to political free speech were violated when the school principal confiscated the shirts, which were decorated with the image of a marijuana leaf.
David Valenzuela, 17, and Chris Fuentes, 18, were told by a Stevens security guard to remove the shirts as they entered their first period class Oct. 20. Principal Katie Bray confiscated the shirts a short time later.
Rapid City superintendent of schools Peter Wharton said Thursday the incident was a violation of school policy, not political rights.
School policy forbids clothing that displays images of alcohol, drugs or tobacco products on school grounds. That policy is clearly communicated to all students, and it is not effected by what issues may or may not be on the ballot in an election year, Wharton said.
“Unequivocally no. It had nothing to do with political speech,” he said.
Students are allowed to wear political t-shirts and other campaign-related items for candidates and issues, as long as they are appropriate, as determined by school administrators, Wharton said. This fall, numerous SHS students have worn t-shirts with an image of a human fetus and the message “Save a Life, Vote Yes on Referred Law 6.”

I’ve had some experience with this kind of ban when Illinois State University tried to
prevent us from distributing flyers with a hemp leaf.
It really disturbs me when school officials believe that they can ban an image regardless of context. It shows such a lack of… intelligence, and a lack of understanding of the constitutional principles that drive our country.
It’s one thing to ban messages that promote illegal activity. That is perfectly acceptable. But to ban any kind of message (text or image) that advocates political action, particularly while allowing other messages (text and image) promoting political action is content-based censorship and has no place in this country.
And a school superintendent who dismisses such constitutional concerns in this way…

“That’s absurd,” said Wharton. “I’m not even going to dignify that argument with a response.” A ballot initiative does not change the enforcement or the interpretation of a school dress-code regulation, he said.

… should not be involved in educating the youth of this country. Peter Wharton should instead be going back to school to learn some of the basics of being an American.

“It can hardly be argued that either students or teachers shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech . . . at the schoolhouse gates.” — U.S. Supreme Court, Tinker v. Des Moines (1969)

This is pretty ridiculous.
Colombia’s new advertising campaign in Europe is apparently a variation on the ONDCP’s Superbowl terrorism nonsense (smoke pot and you help terrorists kill people). The difference is they’re personally blaming Kate Moss for people dying in Colombia.
Here’s one set of quotes from Colombia’s Vice President Francisco Santos:

“To me it’s baffling that somebody who helps cause so much pain in Colombia is doing better than ever and winning more contracts than ever,” he said.
“And I never once heard her say ‘I’m sorry’. When policemen, judges, journalists, common men and women are dying every day because of (drug-related violence), that hurts.
“We need to tell Europeans that that line of coke they snort is tainted in blood.”

Let’s see now. The DEA seized 1,098,523 kilograms of cocaine since 1986. That’s 23,000 times Kate’s body weight and still just a small amount compared to all of the cocaine on the market. Kate may be a pretty major coke-head, but she’s not gonna make a dent in that.
So Kate could quit. All the supermodels and celebrities could quit. And you’d still have violence in Colombia.
But legalize and regulate? You end the black market profits, and the violence. The blood is on the hands of political leaders like Santos — not in Kate’s nose.

I had a fairly major hard drive problem late night on Tuesday. I had to end up erasing and re-formatting. That could be a disaster, given the huge amounts of digital photography I do, and the fact that this blog software depends on the data stored on your computer to upload and maintain the site.
Fortunately, I back up on a regular basis. I had a full hard drive clone from September, and my most recent data backup was on Monday.
So I’m back in action and didn’t even lose a post (all that happened was that Tuesday’s post is now dated with today’s date).
It does give me the opportunity to remind people about my laptop fund. It’s been updated to show the new version that Mac just rolled out — more power and less expensive. I’m still looking for a February 1 purchase. A huge thanks to everyone who has contributed so far.
Oh, and…. back up your computer. You never know.

From the Daily Southtown

Business Group Warns About Rising Prison Population

A skyrocketing prison population, spiraling drug crime and juvenile crime rates come under fire in a major study of Chicago-area crime and criminal justice published today.

Chicago Metropolis 2020, a business-backed think tank, warns most of the 40,000 prisoners released in Illinois this year are “ill-equipped” for life outside prison.

“More than half will likely end up back in prison within three years if present trends continue,” the group’s 2006 Crime and Justice Index warns.

A shortage of rehabilitation programs for inmates, the large distances between downstate prisons and prisoners’ Chicago-area roots and a massive increase in parolees help account for the high reoffending rate, the report said.

While reported crime in the state has fallen since the early 1990s, the prison population has continued to grow steadily since the early 1970s, the report said.

And despite 70 percent of Americans believing the war on drugs is not working, most of the increase in prison numbers is made up of non-violent drug offenders, it said.

I don’t know how anyone with an IQ equal to or greater than a turnip could read that and not conclude that the drug war needs to end. It’s like somebody is beating you over the head with the sledge hammer of truth.

And yet… and yet…. Invariably this kind of information surfaces again and again, and politicians say “we need to be tough on drugs,” and the DEA says “we’re winning the war on drugs,” and the academicians say “we need to find a way to make prohibition work,” and many within the public look around in confusion and are completely unable to figure it out.

Over the years, there has been such an incredible war of propaganda waged in this country that many people are simply unable to comprehend ending the drug war as an option. And so while you stand there pointing at the proof, all they can do is stare at your finger.

As an example of this disconnect, check out a completely incomprehensible OpEd by Christopher Taylor at Kent State. Here’s a college student who appears to want to understand. He has a sense that the drug war doesn’t work, yet whenever he tries to go there, he can’t. He knows that education is better, but he can’t see how to educate without enforcement. It would be funny if it wasn’t so pathetic.