Drug WarRant

Great. Now there’s another big industry that will lobby to oppose legalization of marijuana — the diet industry…

Obesity and Cannabis Use: Results From 2 Representative National Surveys

The role of cannabis and endocannabinoids in appetite regulation has been extensively studied, but the association of cannabis use with weight in the general population is not known. […]

The authors conclude that the prevalence of obesity is lower in cannabis users than in nonusers.

Gives you an appetites so you don’t waste away (wasting disease), yet keeps you from getting fat. Not bad.

One of the most interesting things I’ve read in some time…

A criminal defense attorney in Chicago represented a client who was involved in a situation we’ve seen far too often in this destructive war: SWAT-style serving of a search warrant with no investigation or knowledge of who or what is in the house. In this case, a resident managed to get off four shots aimed low through his bedroom door at what he thought were violent criminal intruders, and he (as well as six children in the house) managed to avoid being killed by the 37 shots fired by police. Naturally, he was charged with attempted first degree murder and aggravated battery.

Here is the closing argument. Simple, powerful, effective.

Update: Reading this well-reasoned and detailed defense, I had no idea what else was floating around out there regarding this case.

Check out this ugly piece by Chuck Goudie at the Daily Herald: Chicago cops wounded, accused shooter walks

If Mr. Green, now 23, resumes the same line of work that he was in before his arrest, he may well have police visitors in his home sometime in the future.
Then, if Green starts shooting at police, the 12 people he’ll need won’t be jurors.
They’ll be pallbearers.

Apparently, Goudie, who wasn’t there and apparently didn’t bother to read the transcripts, merely looked at the the fact that police were shot and came to the conclusion that the person who did it should fry, regardless of the circumstances.

And he’s got plenty of support at a place like Second City Cop where the commenters are more anxious to volunteer to be the future pallbearers of the person who was defending his home (or to say that “this mutt will be dead within a few years”) than to ask questions regarding what actually happened.

Heading to my Dad’s place for Labor Day – no wifi there so no posting, but I’ll be able to follow what’s going on.

If you’re on the road this weekend, travel safe.

Hernando County’s takeover of jail brings year of sweeping changes

Interesting article about a Sheriff’s office that has taken back a jail that had been privatized through the Corrections Corporation of America. Through some innovative steps, he looks to save $1 million the first year in operating costs compared to what it cost privatized.

Perhaps this will catch some people’s attention and slow the privatization trend.

I’m a strong opponent of private prisons. I don’t think the criminal justice system should be tainted by profit considerations. Cost considerations? Sure. But not profit.

Stupid headline award. Illegal Marijuana Operations Are Destroying Public Lands: Could Legalization Help?

Really? That’s like saying: “The cows are getting out and wandering all over. Could a fence help?” Well, duh.

How can this even be a debatable item? And I’m sure the writer, Joshua Frank, is trying to be a journalist or something, but being a journalist doesn’t mean you can’t say what is indisputably true. You don’t have to say “according to some advocates, the earth revolves around the sun.” He didn’t find anyone who disputed the notion that legalization would solve the grows on public lands issue; only some that didn’t want legalization because they were making money from it being illegal.

Because 25 Year for 25 Grams of Percocet Was Not Tough Enough – Jacob Sullum does a nice job discussing the new crackdown on “pill mills” in Florida.

Medical pot users say their needs are ignored as dispensaries closed
Interesting comments section (thanks, Nick) showing strong support for medical marijuana in Michigan.

I did find one comment unintentionally funny: “Though I am a hard core TEA party constitutionalist, I feel that pot should be legal.” Though? Though? Just goes to show how warped the tea party movement got through being co-opted by social conservatives. It should have been obvious that limited government tea party constitutionalists would of course support legalization.

UMass Amherst professor says he will appeal DEA denial for medical marijuana grow

Judge allows challenge to New York “stop and frisk”

Former Labor Secretary Robert Reich was in a discussion at Reddit. Jonathan Moormann reports:

As happens whenever a political debate is exposed to the internet for too long, the discussion eventually turned to pot. Reich commented that, if he could repeal one U.S. regulation, it would be to legalize marijuana. He also mentions that, while at Oxford with fellow grad student Bill Clinton, they “didn’t inhale together.” This isn’t that surprising, considering Reich has supported legalization before, but it’s pretty funny to imagine him and Slick Willy lighting up together.

This labor day, Americans all over will celebrate by drinking alcohol, but those who celebrate with cannabis may face punitive drug tests at their job.

Legalizing marijuana should be on the list of Labor Day accomplishments, along with the 40-hour work week, weekends, safe working conditions, and health insurance.

UN official discusses global organized crime with US congressional delegation

Yury Fedotov, the UNODC Executive Director, and the US delegation took note of the interconnections between the various forms of illicit crimes across the globe, with the US legislators showing particular interest in the linkages between transnational organized crime, drug trafficking and terrorism, during the meeting at the UNODC headquarters in Vienna on Friday.

Yes, there are linkages between organized crime, drug trafficking, and terrorism. But understanding those links and how to deal with them requires an intelligence not likely found in that room.

You say the word “terrorism” to people in Congress, and there’s a chemical reaction akin to negative emotions in Dr. David Banner, and they suddenly want to transform into a hulking Department of Defense and just smash things.

So, naturally, Fedotov is going to say the words crime, terrorism, and drugs together as often as possible.

And it works.

Last year, the United States pledged $34.3 million to assist in implementing UNODC’s work across the globe, and Washington is a lead supporter of the Office’s programmes.

Interesting that I constantly hear about Congress’s antipathy towards the U.N. and threats to remove funding, and yet nobody, on either side of the aisle, seems to ever have anything bad to say about the UNODC. Perhaps it’s because that part of the U.N. doesn’t seem to be hung up on annoying concepts like peace or human rights, or getting in the way of their desire to smash things.

Link

The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) will unveil the results of the latest (2010) National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) at a press conference on Thursday, September 8.

This is an annual affair where, prior to letting the rest of the world see the data, they painstakingly go through it and cherry-pick statistics that bolster their policies in contradictory ways.

They will find one data point that has gone down since the last report and proclaim it as proof that our drug policies work!

They’ll find another data point that has gone up since the last report and soberly point out that this means that we have to apply our drug policies even more stringently.

And those members of the press who are mindless drones (fewer than there used to be, but still way too many) will actually report that as news.

Whatever the numbers say, the presentation on Thursday will conclude that we’re doing all the right things and we just need to do more of them.

At the press conference:

* Pamela S. Hyde, Administrator, SAMHSA, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)

* Gil Kerlikowske, Director, White House Office of National Drug Control Policy

* Westley Clark, M.D., M.P.H. Director, Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, SAMHSA, HHS

* Thomas S. Gilbert, CAADC, CEO/President TouchStone Intervention & Professional Services and person in long-term recovery

* Sandra Huffman, person in long-term recovery

* Mildred M. Minor, Program Coordinator at Arlington Recovery Empowerment Center, Arlington VA and person in recovery from depression

There will, however, be nobody at the press conference who doesn’t have an anti-drug agenda, or who is interested in the entire picture.

Creating tomorrow’s activists, one at a time.

Keep the passion, Ashley.

On August 27th, I caught a remark by President Calderón buried in the Honduras Weekly and the Latin American Herald Tribune:

If Americans “are determined and resigned to consume drugs, then look for market alternatives that cancel out the criminals’ astronomical profits or establish clear entry points for the drugs distinct from the border with Mexico, but this situation can no longer continue unchanged,” he said.

A powerful and provocative statement. I also noted that mainstream media seemed to be ignoring that part of the speech entirely.

On August 30th (three days later) another blogger named Tim Padgett somehow found out about Calderón’s statement (maybe on his own, maybe somebody pointed out my post, I don’t know) and also wrote about it.

Well, Drug Czar Gil Kerlikowski has responded to the story by writing to… me? No, he wrote to Tim.

So what’s the deal, Gil? Don’t you like me? Why does Tim get the love? He was a little late to the game – you should have been writing me.

Is it something I said? Did your secretary lose my address? Just ask Michele for it – she probably has it.

I’ll admit that it may have something to do with the fact that Tim’s blog happens to reside at Time.com, providing a significant automatic boost in readers compared to DrugWarRant.com.

Could it also have anything to do with the fact that I might not be a particularly easy audience for your letter? And that you thought you might be able to pull one past the mainstream media guy (it’s always worked in the past)? Well, it’s a different world now, so if that was the case, it only half worked.

This seems oddly familiar…

The White House is setting up a We the People website, where citizens can petition the government… and get a response.

Anyone 13 or older can create or sign a petition on WhiteHouse.gov asking the Obama Administration to take action on a range of important issues facing our country. […]

Creating or signing a petition is just the first step. It’s up to you to build support for a petition and gather even more signatures. […]

If a petition meets the signature threshold, it will be reviewed by the Administration and an official response will be issued. And we’ll make sure that the petition is sent to the appropriate policy makers in the Administration.

The initial threshold to get a response from the Administration is 5,000 signatures.

Drug policy reform has dominated every other citizen-based feedback forum (change.gov, the various townhall and video townhall events, etc), and I’m sure we’ll do the same here (as we should). It’s the same idea dressed up in new clothes.

Like all similar efforts in this administrations, this rings a bit like providing bread and circuses to the populace – giving them the feel-good sense of government being “open and accountable,” when it’s anything but.

Despite my cynicism, these opportunities do provide us with something of value. Not in terms of reaching the government (they already know their answer to our petition), but in terms of reaching the people and making them aware of how many other people are demanding change.

Just down the road from me, there’s been a contentious situation as teachers have been on strike. One of the strike issues has been over mandatory random suspicionless drug-testing for teachers.

The main newspaper in the area has come forward with a powerful editorial: At Illini Bluffs, A Principle Worthy Of The Picket Line

The teachers strike at Illini Bluffs is into its second week and eyeballing a third, and it has been fascinating, if also a bit depressing, to read the back-and-forth in the on-line comments to Journal Star stories.

Once upon a time this nation stood for something, affording its citizens an unprecedented set of civil liberties. Americans got used to those, so much so that they wouldn’t give them up without a fight. Apparently that spirit has vanished from certain segments of the population, if not from the ranks of these teachers. […]

Ultimately, it’s about the kind of country you want to live in. The nation’s Founding Fathers got it. ( Benjamin Franklin: “Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.” ) The teachers get it. The Illini Bluffs School Board doesn’t. ( No wonder its members have remained so silent. )

And unfortunately a fair number of citizens don’t get it either. They subscribe to the misperception that such random drug testing policies are common. ( If there is another Illinois public school district that does what Illini Bluffs is proposing, no one seems to be aware of it. ) Routine are the all-too-porous arguments that these teachers “are lucky to have a job” or “if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to worry about.” ( Imagine the constitutional abuses that could be excused by those attitudes. ) One appreciates that this economy has cowed a lot of people, but this level of passive and compliant seems downright un-American. Who’d have thought sticking up for the Constitution would prove in the least bit unpopular?

Freedom. What a concept.