Chemophobia and taboo in drug prohibition

Chemophobia is an irrational fear of chemicals and chemistry. Many examples exist. Some individuals believe certain synthetic chemicals are toxins whereas “natural” or derived substances are safe, even though the two substances are identical in every other respect. Similar reactions occur with cannabis. Recreational marijuana is condemned while medical marijuana is acceptable, even though the marijuana flowers used recreationally or medicinally can originate from the same plant.

Chemophobics believe toxicity is determined by the substance alone. In point of fact the harm comes from excessive exposures or dosages. Levels of toxicity are measured by laboratory testing to determine toxicity for animals of a given body weight. A problem for prohibitionists who want THC and psilocybin use to remain criminalized, and its users stigmatized, is that no toxic levels can be determined for either of the two chemical compounds. Prohibitionists are left with few other options than to declare the two substances to be taboo.

Sigmund Freud, the father of psychoanalysis, in his 1913 book Totem and Taboo, analyzed social phenomena and behavior which will likely be recognized by those caught up in the anguish and confusion emerging from the modern drug war:

The taboo restrictions are different from religious or moral prohibitions. They are not traced to a commandment of a god but really they themselves impose their own prohibitions; they are differentiated from moral prohibition by failing to be included in a system which declares abstinences in general to be necessary and gives reason for this necessity. The taboo prohibitions lack all justification and are of unknown origin. Though incomprehensible to us they are taken as a matter of course by those who are under their dominance. […]

Wherever the taboo was related to ideas of gods and demons, automatic punishment was expected from the poser of the godhead. In other cases, probably because of a further development of the idea, society took over the punishment of the offender whose action has endangered his companions. […]

The violation of a taboo makes the offender himself taboo … certain dangers resulting from the violation of a taboo may be exercised through acts of penance and ceremonies of purification. […]

We may say … we deal with a series of restrictions which these primitive people impose upon themselves; this and that is forbidden without any apparent reason; nor does it occur to them to question this matter, for they subject themselves to these restrictions as a matter of course and are convinced that any transgression will be punished automatically in the most severe manner. […]

The most peculiar part of it is that anyone who has violated such a prohibition assumes the nature of the forbidden object as if he had absorbed the whole dangerous charge. […]

Both this word and the system corresponding to it express a fragment of psychic life which really is not comprehensible to us. And indeed, it would seem that no understanding of it could be possible without entering into the study of the belief in spirits and demons which is so characteristic of these low grades of culture. […]

Taboos are a big business in the United States. Aside from drug enforcement, drug rehabilitation centers fulfill the role of providing acts of penance and ceremonies of purification for those caught using taboo substances. The drug rehab industry receives multi-billions of dollars in federal funding each year through Medicare, Medicaid, SAMSHA, and other HHS programs.

Until a cure for addictions can be found, drug rehabilitation programs offer fairly effective addiction treatments when combined with therapeutically prescribed drugs. Unfortunately, more than 95-percent of people needing drug rehabilitation in 2023 did not receive it.

Despite the promising results offered by psychedelic compounds for addiction treatment, lobbying costs for legalizing psychedelic use and therapies comes from psychedelic startups and not Big Pharma. Pharmaceutical companies are certain to lose revenue from drugs they currently market if any of their products are made obsolete by easy access to non-patentable psychedelics and THC.

Any individual who stands accused of assuming or absorbing the forbidden nature of a drug — according to taboos that equate the drug with a drug’s consumer — is a victim of an insane process leading to schemes that demonize and brand people. Prejudices and stereotypes make drug wars possible. Authoritarian governments promoting punishments of those whose drug use offends a particular culture’s god, guru, or religious beliefs, are virtually guaranteed to foment wars and inquisitions. The bloodiest European battle ever fought was the Thirty Years War (1618-1648). Eight-million people were killed with what began as domestic clashes between established Catholics and dissident Protestants.

Despite all the warring parties, progress in combating drug taboos and drug wars is still achievable by employing education that reduces chemophobia through increasing public awareness of basic chemistry and other sciences. As with all social changes there are obstacles to overcome.

People avoid studying science or chemistry because it is abstract and therefore difficult. The topic requires studying physics and complicated math as well as chemicals and their molecular interactions. Science demands different ways of thinking from people who may have been continuously persuaded by ethnocentric cultures to never think for themselves. Science studies can take up much of a person’s time. Some students fear focusing on science because the workload could result in lowering their grade point average. Time spent on science studies can also force students to cut back on their social activities.

Another problem for American science education is that various religious groups deliberately steer their members away from science altogether. Books about dinosaurs are sometimes prohibited from appearing on the library bookshelves of publicly funded primary schools. Science instruction in some school districts is limited to middle and high school students. Even then it’s only offered in the form of elective courses. An ignorance of science is preferred to that of initiating quality science teaching early on in public primary schools where it can prove most interesting and mentally stimulating to younger audiences.

Among many other anti-medicine cults, sects and religions that reject modern medicine, the Christian Science religion doesn’t believe in the germ theory of disease or the use of drugs to treat disease. It demeans science knowledge among its members while promoting a theology of fatalism that says deaths from illnesses are predetermined and inevitable despite the existence of medicines that can treat or cure afflictions. The drug taboos pertain to Christian Science children as well as adults. Jehovah’s Witnesses believe blood transfusions are taboo. In their world view a blood transfer from one person to another is a form of cannibalism, so they reject common surgeries requiring transfusions that can save their own lives or the lives of their family members. Mormonism treats tea and coffee as taboo despite growing scientific evidence showing that moderate levels of caffeine in tea or coffee can help reduce the onset of dementia. Then there are the anti-vaxxers.

Reversing the annoying trend of America’s paranoid chemophobia would profoundly improve public health. People who seek to understand their own brain chemistry and that of others typically make better choices about drug use and vaccinations along with nearly everything else health related. Rather than saying no to drugs, they just say know to drugs, resulting in longer, happier, and better lives.

This entry was posted in Servetus. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Chemophobia and taboo in drug prohibition

  1. Servetus says:

    Republican Iowa gubernatorial candidate Adam Steen claims abortion drugs such as mifepristone are contaminating the local water supply:

    About an hour into the Republican gubernatorial debate in Iowa earlier this year, Adam Steen, who is one of the leading candidates in the primary, made an eye-popping claim.

    “We need to decimate the chemical abortions,” Steen said. “You talk about water quality, what’s happening in our water because of that, those chemical abortions that are coming through there.” […]

    The comment received relatively little notice apart from a few mentions on social media. However, Steen’s claim was notable both as an indication of how far to the right the GOP gubernatorial hopefuls are running in a state that already bans most abortions after six weeks and because it is part of a national push from anti-abortion groups to make speculative and far fetched environmental concerns a core part of their messaging. The effort to frame abortion medication as a threat to the water supply is one such claim, and lacks any concrete scientific basis. […]

    After declaring “life begins at conception” and calling that point “the most important issue of this entire gubernatorial race,” Steen launched into his remarks connecting water safety, which is an especially pertinent issue in Iowa, with the right-wing cause of limiting access to abortion. […]

    A spokesperson said Steen was “referencing” a white paper titled “Abortion In Our Water” that was produced by the group Liberty Counsel Action last year. The report claims “our waterways are being contaminated by chemical abortion drugs and human remains as American women — left alone at home to endure the agonizing process of expelling their pregnancy — are often instructed by abortion providers to dispose of their aborted child’s remains down the toilet.”

    Liberty Counsel Action shares some leadership with Liberty Counsel, which has been labeled a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center. The group is a legal organization closely affiliated with the evangelical Liberty University. […]

    Water quality is a serious issue in Iowa, said Prof. David Cwiertny, an engineer and wastewater expert who is the director of the University of Iowa’s Center for Health Effects of Environmental Contamination. However, unlike Steen, he did not attribute the problem to abortion.

    “Our biggest issue is nitrate levels — which is a regulated contaminant — are high, and many communities are having to seek out other sources that are not contaminated by nitrate,” Cwiertny explained.

    Iowa is a center for farming and meat processing. Agricultural runoff contains nitrates from manure and fertilizer. Nitrates have been linked to high rates of cancer in the state. […]

    While Cwiertny said the water quality discussion should be broadened to encompass other chemicals like pesticides and fungicides as well as some widely used medicines, he does not see mifepristone as a high priority area of concern. […]

    Cwiertny suggested Liberty Counsel’s concerns about human remains from terminated pregnancies in the water supply were overblown.

    Cwiertny noted that mifepristone is only used by “a subset of the population that’s a subset of the population.” As such, he questioned whether it would even be identifiable in water systems.

    “In that report, they talk about 30 to 40 tons of hazardous medical waste — including human remains — being flushed into the water systems. 30 to 40 tons. I don’t know if that’s on an annual basis, I’m assuming it is, because they’re talking about the number of chemical abortions per year,” said Cwiertny. “For perspective, publicly owned treatment works generate over 13.8 million tons of dry weight sludge. So it’s a matter of scale. If we’re producing, you know, 14 million tons of solids from human waste after it’s been dewatered, focusing on 30 to 40 is — that’s, like, not even a drop in the bucket.” […]

    In general, while Cwiertny said experts should be addressing issues of more widely used chemicals in the water supply, he also noted that modern treatment systems are robust. They can accommodate medicines and human waste from medical procedures.

    “We put human waste down sewers. That is just what they’re there for, and they are designed to handle relatively large masses of human waste flushed down toilets daily,” Cwiertny said. “The system is designed that way. And we do have advanced treatment these days, and more and more water systems are turning to them to produce water coming out of wastewater that is as pure as you can find.” […]

    Talking Points Memo: Pseudoscientific Push to Frame Abortion as a ‘Water Quality’ Issue Rears Its Head in Iowa

    Author: Hunter Walker

  2. Servetus says:

    Reduce liver fat and improve metabolic health with CBD and CBG:

    Scientists have identified two non intoxicating compounds from cannabis that may help reduce liver fat while improving metabolic health. The compounds, CBD and CBG, appear to support the liver in two important ways. They increase the organ’s ability to store backup energy and restore the activity of cellular systems that break down harmful waste. Together, these effects could offer a new plant based strategy for treating the most common chronic liver disorder worldwide.

    [The] study suggests that Cannabidiol (CBD) and Cannabigerol (CBG), which do not cause a high, may improve liver health by altering how liver cells handle energy and remove unwanted material. […]

    Using advanced scientific tools, the researchers discovered that CBD and CBG do more than simply reduce fat accumulation. The compounds appear to improve the internal functioning of liver cells through a process called “metabolic remodeling.”

    One key discovery involved the liver’s energy reserves. The compounds increased levels of phosphocreatine, a molecule that acts like an emergency energy supply. This backup energy source helps liver cells maintain normal function when exposed to metabolic stress such as a high fat diet. Scientists note that the liver does not usually rely heavily on this system, making the finding particularly notable. […]

    The study also showed that CBD and CBG reactivate cathepsins. These enzymes operate inside lysosomes, which serve as recycling centers within the cell. Their role is to break down unwanted materials so they can be removed.

    When cathepsin activity is restored, liver cells become better equipped to process and eliminate harmful fats and waste. The researchers observed major reductions in damaging lipid molecules including triglycerides and ceramides. Ceramides are especially harmful because they are linked to insulin resistance and inflammation in the liver. […]

    Although both compounds produced beneficial effects, the study found that they influence metabolic health in slightly different ways. CBD and CBG both helped stabilize blood sugar levels and improved how the body processes glucose.

    However, CBG produced stronger improvements in several metabolic markers. It significantly reduced body fat mass and increased insulin sensitivity more than CBD. The compound also showed a stronger ability to lower total cholesterol and levels of “bad” LDL cholesterol.

    “Our findings identify a new mechanism by which CBD and CBG enhance hepatic energy and lysosomal function,” says Prof. Joseph Tam. “This dual metabolic remodeling contributes to improved liver lipid handling and highlights these compounds as promising therapeutic agents for MASLD.” […]

    Science Daily: Cannabis compounds CBD and CBG may help reverse fatty liver disease, study finds, CBD and CBG may help the liver burn fat, restore metabolism, and fight fatty liver disease

    British Journal of Pharmacology: Cannabidiol and cannabigerol ameliorate steatotic liver disease via phosphocreatine buffering and lysosomal restoration

    Authors: Radka Kočvarová, Shahar Azar, Bella Agranovich, Ifat Abramovich, Saveliy Kirillov, Alina Nemirovski, Saja Baraghithy, Inbar Plaschkes, Emmanuelle Merquiol, Alexander Rouvinski, Galia Blum, Liad Hinden, Joseph Tam.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *