If you haven’t seen it before, here’s the commercial that it’s spoofing.
[Thanks, Paul!]
|
|||||
If you haven’t seen it before, here’s the commercial that it’s spoofing. [Thanks, Paul!] In my ideal world, Insite (North America’s first legal supervised drug injection site) would be even more effective in a legalized drug regime, supplying clean controlled drugs and eliminating the black market, rather than being simply a place to safely inject drugs obtained on the street. The people who speak out the most vociferously in favour of Insite are addicted, not to the drugs themselves, but to the living they earn from serving drug addicts or, less concretely but just as dangerously, to the ecstatic feeling of beneficence that comes from believing they are helping the downtrodden. Unbelievable. Karin Litzcke‰s opinion about harm reduction is some of the vilest spew I‰ve read in quite some time. Tragically, she doesn‰t even see the irony of spouting off about the so-called empathy industry allegedly making its living off the backs of addicts while ignoring that police, prosecutors, prison officials and the like all make their livings off the back of drug prohibition. Drug prohibition that, by the way, is directly responsible for most of the evils that harm reduction attempts to mitigate. Drug prohibition that is also responsible for most of the damage that addiction causes to both the addict and society. Exactly. Use poisons to spray crops in Colombia damaging the ecosystems and driving the traffickers into the clear-cutting in the rainforest… thus blame drug users for damaging the environment. |
|||||
Copyright © 2021 Drug WarRant - All Rights Reserved Powered by WordPress & Atahualpa |
Recent Comments