<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Once again, marijuana is a non-issue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.drugwarrant.com/2010/02/once-again-marijuana-is-a-non-issue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.drugwarrant.com/2010/02/once-again-marijuana-is-a-non-issue/</link>
	<description>by Pete Guither</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 01:57:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Colorado Medical LLC</title>
		<link>http://www.drugwarrant.com/2010/02/once-again-marijuana-is-a-non-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-8483</link>
		<dc:creator>Colorado Medical LLC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 13:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drugwarrant.com/?p=5311#comment-8483</guid>
		<description>As we all know SB109 passed on Tuesday setting regulations for younger patients and doctors. Thursday in the state capital our senate committee will take public comment so please get out and exercise your free speech if you can on Thursday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As we all know SB109 passed on Tuesday setting regulations for younger patients and doctors. Thursday in the state capital our senate committee will take public comment so please get out and exercise your free speech if you can on Thursday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kaptinemo</title>
		<link>http://www.drugwarrant.com/2010/02/once-again-marijuana-is-a-non-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-8439</link>
		<dc:creator>kaptinemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drugwarrant.com/?p=5311#comment-8439</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;“For the past three months, angry residents have gathered in town hall meetings asking politicians to slam the brakes on one of the fastest growing businesses in Colorado.”&lt;/i&gt;

Now, I have to ask, &lt;i&gt;which&lt;/i&gt; &#039;angry residents&#039;? The perennial grumpy-pantsed, proudly ignorant and half-senile old duffers who are always yelling at kids to get off their lawns? The control-freak Linda Taylor types who believe they can micro-monitor &#039;the children&#039; into blissful (and non-existent) safety? Lawmen showing up in town halls in (taxpayer supplied) uniforms to try to intimidate lawmakers? And of course, &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.wfmu.org/freeform/2006/11/william_s_burro.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;William S. Burrough&#039;s&lt;/a&gt; favorites: &lt;i&gt;...decent church-goin&#039; women, with their mean, pinched, bitter, evil faces&quot;&lt;/i&gt;? 

&lt;i&gt;Those&lt;/i&gt; &#039;angry residents&#039;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>“For the past three months, angry residents have gathered in town hall meetings asking politicians to slam the brakes on one of the fastest growing businesses in Colorado.”</i></p>
<p>Now, I have to ask, <i>which</i> &#8216;angry residents&#8217;? The perennial grumpy-pantsed, proudly ignorant and half-senile old duffers who are always yelling at kids to get off their lawns? The control-freak Linda Taylor types who believe they can micro-monitor &#8216;the children&#8217; into blissful (and non-existent) safety? Lawmen showing up in town halls in (taxpayer supplied) uniforms to try to intimidate lawmakers? And of course, <a href="http://blog.wfmu.org/freeform/2006/11/william_s_burro.html" rel="nofollow">William S. Burrough&#8217;s</a> favorites: <i>&#8230;decent church-goin&#8217; women, with their mean, pinched, bitter, evil faces&#8221;</i>? </p>
<p><i>Those</i> &#8216;angry residents&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.drugwarrant.com/2010/02/once-again-marijuana-is-a-non-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-8413</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 01:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drugwarrant.com/?p=5311#comment-8413</guid>
		<description>“For the past three months, angry residents have gathered in town hall meetings asking politicians to slam the brakes on one of the fastest growing businesses in Colorado.”

Well in reality it isn&#039;t an expanding business at all. It&#039;s just that the revenues are now visible as they&#039;re being diverted from the invisible black market onto the books of licensed businesses. Of course that means taxes are being collected, criminals are making less money, etc. All I can figure out is that people are effin&#039; crazy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“For the past three months, angry residents have gathered in town hall meetings asking politicians to slam the brakes on one of the fastest growing businesses in Colorado.”</p>
<p>Well in reality it isn&#8217;t an expanding business at all. It&#8217;s just that the revenues are now visible as they&#8217;re being diverted from the invisible black market onto the books of licensed businesses. Of course that means taxes are being collected, criminals are making less money, etc. All I can figure out is that people are effin&#8217; crazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Dunkle</title>
		<link>http://www.drugwarrant.com/2010/02/once-again-marijuana-is-a-non-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-8411</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Dunkle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drugwarrant.com/?p=5311#comment-8411</guid>
		<description>Indeed this is a classic example of self-censorship which is a vital part of manufacturing consent.

&quot;Do no evil&quot;??  Fuck you, Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed this is a classic example of self-censorship which is a vital part of manufacturing consent.</p>
<p>&#8220;Do no evil&#8221;??  Fuck you, Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: denbee</title>
		<link>http://www.drugwarrant.com/2010/02/once-again-marijuana-is-a-non-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-8405</link>
		<dc:creator>denbee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 21:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drugwarrant.com/?p=5311#comment-8405</guid>
		<description>As you know, Congressman Barney Frank of Massachusetts introduced legislation regarding marijuana use, H.R. 2835, on June 6, 2009. This legislation would limit the penalties for possessing small amounts of marijuana. Specifically, it would prohibit federal penalties for the possession of marijuana for personal use or for any not-for-profit transfer of marijuana. Possession of more than 100 grams of marijuana, or the transfer of more than 1 gram, would remain illegal. Shortly after its introduction, H.R. 2835 was referred to the House Judiciary Committee and House Energy and Commerce Committee. We need to keep up the volume, shout out your representatives. Ask them why H.R. 2835 was buried?
  “Our nation can acknowledge the dangers of cigarettes, alcohol and marijuana while still permitting their use. The only logically and morally consistent argument for marijuana prohibition necessitates the criminalization of all harmful recreational drugs, including alcohol, nicotine and caffeine. We can agree that such an infringement on personal freedoms is as impractical as it is un-American. The time has come to accept that our nation&#039;s attitude toward marijuana has been misguided for generations and that the only rational approach to cannabis is to legalize, regulate and tax it.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you know, Congressman Barney Frank of Massachusetts introduced legislation regarding marijuana use, H.R. 2835, on June 6, 2009. This legislation would limit the penalties for possessing small amounts of marijuana. Specifically, it would prohibit federal penalties for the possession of marijuana for personal use or for any not-for-profit transfer of marijuana. Possession of more than 100 grams of marijuana, or the transfer of more than 1 gram, would remain illegal. Shortly after its introduction, H.R. 2835 was referred to the House Judiciary Committee and House Energy and Commerce Committee. We need to keep up the volume, shout out your representatives. Ask them why H.R. 2835 was buried?<br />
  “Our nation can acknowledge the dangers of cigarettes, alcohol and marijuana while still permitting their use. The only logically and morally consistent argument for marijuana prohibition necessitates the criminalization of all harmful recreational drugs, including alcohol, nicotine and caffeine. We can agree that such an infringement on personal freedoms is as impractical as it is un-American. The time has come to accept that our nation&#8217;s attitude toward marijuana has been misguided for generations and that the only rational approach to cannabis is to legalize, regulate and tax it.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just me</title>
		<link>http://www.drugwarrant.com/2010/02/once-again-marijuana-is-a-non-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-8404</link>
		<dc:creator>Just me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 21:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drugwarrant.com/?p=5311#comment-8404</guid>
		<description>Hey Kaptin, lets pinch that penny til it oozes zinc! and Abe screams uncle! Maybe then Big brother wont act like such big billy badass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Kaptin, lets pinch that penny til it oozes zinc! and Abe screams uncle! Maybe then Big brother wont act like such big billy badass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snarkles the klown</title>
		<link>http://www.drugwarrant.com/2010/02/once-again-marijuana-is-a-non-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-8395</link>
		<dc:creator>snarkles the klown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drugwarrant.com/?p=5311#comment-8395</guid>
		<description>I noticed the sarcasm and love it! Sardonic wrath in writing is fun!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed the sarcasm and love it! Sardonic wrath in writing is fun!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kaptinemo</title>
		<link>http://www.drugwarrant.com/2010/02/once-again-marijuana-is-a-non-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-8390</link>
		<dc:creator>kaptinemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drugwarrant.com/?p=5311#comment-8390</guid>
		<description>Friends, I have no crystal ball. All I have is history to guide me. But the same pattern that was evident during alcohol Prohibition is indeed repeating itself.

Our opponents believe that drug prohibition is immutable, inviolable, set in stone, eternal. They mirror the same sentiments of Texas Senator Morris Sheppard in 1930 when he spoke about alcohol Prohibition: &lt;i&gt;&quot; &quot;There is as much chance of repealing the Eighteenth Amendment as there is for a humming-bird to fly to the planet Mars with the Washington Monument tied to its tail.&quot;&#039;&lt;/i&gt; 3 short years later, Sheppard and his ilk were in desperate need of ketchup to cover the taste of the crow they were forced to eat.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/History/rnp/RNPI.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This article&lt;/a&gt; gives a feel for what it was like for the anti-Prohibition forces, who faced the same problems we do, the same kind of sneering derision that they were engaging in a &#039;fool&#039;s errand&#039;. It mirrors the very same sense of almost forlorn hope combined with deep cynicism that we presently must endure...but, &lt;i&gt;endure we &lt;b&gt;will.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;

For, history records who had the last laugh. because, like us today, the anti-Prohibitionists had one terrible, implacable, overwhelmingly powerful ally on their hands. That ally could not be scorned, nor could it be suborned. It could not be bribed or arrested and imprisoned on false charges and silenced. Nothing could be done to it, because it wasn&#039;t  a living being at all.

I am referring, to, of course, the economy. And we face the same &#039;harsh schoolmaster&#039; in today&#039;s economic problems. And his &#039;hickory switch&#039; still stings like a MFer when you&#039;re hit with it, as millions have found out and continue to.

As much as I hate it, it will not be voice of sweet reason but the scream of pinched pennies that will herald the end of drug prohibition...just as it was the last time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Friends, I have no crystal ball. All I have is history to guide me. But the same pattern that was evident during alcohol Prohibition is indeed repeating itself.</p>
<p>Our opponents believe that drug prohibition is immutable, inviolable, set in stone, eternal. They mirror the same sentiments of Texas Senator Morris Sheppard in 1930 when he spoke about alcohol Prohibition: <i>&#8221; &#8220;There is as much chance of repealing the Eighteenth Amendment as there is for a humming-bird to fly to the planet Mars with the Washington Monument tied to its tail.&#8221;&#8216;</i> 3 short years later, Sheppard and his ilk were in desperate need of ketchup to cover the taste of the crow they were forced to eat.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/History/rnp/RNPI.html" rel="nofollow">This article</a> gives a feel for what it was like for the anti-Prohibition forces, who faced the same problems we do, the same kind of sneering derision that they were engaging in a &#8216;fool&#8217;s errand&#8217;. It mirrors the very same sense of almost forlorn hope combined with deep cynicism that we presently must endure&#8230;but, <i>endure we <b>will.</b></i></p>
<p>For, history records who had the last laugh. because, like us today, the anti-Prohibitionists had one terrible, implacable, overwhelmingly powerful ally on their hands. That ally could not be scorned, nor could it be suborned. It could not be bribed or arrested and imprisoned on false charges and silenced. Nothing could be done to it, because it wasn&#8217;t  a living being at all.</p>
<p>I am referring, to, of course, the economy. And we face the same &#8216;harsh schoolmaster&#8217; in today&#8217;s economic problems. And his &#8216;hickory switch&#8217; still stings like a MFer when you&#8217;re hit with it, as millions have found out and continue to.</p>
<p>As much as I hate it, it will not be voice of sweet reason but the scream of pinched pennies that will herald the end of drug prohibition&#8230;just as it was the last time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iDub</title>
		<link>http://www.drugwarrant.com/2010/02/once-again-marijuana-is-a-non-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-8385</link>
		<dc:creator>iDub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drugwarrant.com/?p=5311#comment-8385</guid>
		<description>reminds me of China...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reminds me of China&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cannabis</title>
		<link>http://www.drugwarrant.com/2010/02/once-again-marijuana-is-a-non-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-8383</link>
		<dc:creator>Cannabis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drugwarrant.com/?p=5311#comment-8383</guid>
		<description>Pete, you must remember the &lt;snark&gt; and &lt;/snark&gt; tags.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete, you must remember the &lt;snark&gt; and &lt;/snark&gt; tags.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
