Comments on: Legalization Discussion in California http://www.drugwarrant.com/2009/10/legalization-discussion-in-california/ by Pete Guither Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:20:36 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: T.K.O. http://www.drugwarrant.com/2009/10/legalization-discussion-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-3622 T.K.O. Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:23:23 +0000 http://www.drugwarrant.com/?p=4637#comment-3622 Excuse the typos. It has been a long day. And NO I am not high right now. ~smiles~ Excuse the typos. It has been a long day.
And NO I am not high right now. ~smiles~

Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

]]> By: T.K.O. http://www.drugwarrant.com/2009/10/legalization-discussion-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-3620 T.K.O. Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:20:29 +0000 http://www.drugwarrant.com/?p=4637#comment-3620 I smoked my first joint when I was in my teens. I graduated from High School with good grades, went onto complete 4 years of College & after that I held down two jobs for several years. I am now 46 and I still smoke Pot. It is not something I do daily. I smoke it mostly to relax and deal with the aches and pains. I am 100% in agreement with Dusty on everything he posted. The revenue that could be generated from Marijuana is pretty much infinity and for a 'drug' that shouldn't even be called a drug. It certainly is not a dangerous drug! And that revenue could be used to get those dangerous drugs and the people who sell and use them off the streets. There are so many cells being occupied by pot users serious that could/should be freed up to contain serious criminals. As with anything ... you can use it or abuse it! I do not abuse it. Three hits off a pipe 3 or 4 times a week. I don't smoke and drive and I'm not a drinkers. And Marijuana was NOT a gateway to other drugs for me either. In all honesty, all of these over medicated children, and there are a lot of them, would probably do better being treated with Marijuana than the super, mega prescription drugs with all of their nasty side effects that the Big Pharma is making a mint of off!!! It's all Politics! I lived in California and I was one of those who voted in favor of Prop. 215 and the way the Powers That Be just overturned it's huge passing ... well ... the people spoke and the Government spoke back. I have not voted since then. What is the point of voting if our votes, WE THE PEOPLE don't count, what's the point? Enough for now. Have a Great Day All I smoked my first joint when I was in my teens. I graduated from High School with good grades, went onto complete 4 years of College & after that I held down two jobs for several years. I am now 46 and I still smoke Pot.
It is not something I do daily. I smoke it mostly to relax and deal with the aches and pains. I am 100% in agreement with Dusty on everything he posted. The revenue that could be generated from Marijuana is pretty much infinity and for a ‘drug’ that shouldn’t even be called a drug. It certainly is not a dangerous drug! And that revenue could be used to get those dangerous drugs and the people who sell and use them off the streets. There are so many cells being occupied by pot users serious that could/should be freed up to contain serious criminals.
As with anything … you can use it or abuse it! I do not abuse it. Three hits off a pipe 3 or 4 times a week. I don’t smoke and drive and I’m not a drinkers. And Marijuana was NOT a gateway to other drugs for me either. In all honesty, all of these over medicated children, and there are a lot of them, would probably do better being treated with Marijuana than the super, mega prescription drugs with all of their nasty side effects that the Big Pharma is making a mint of off!!!
It’s all Politics! I lived in California and I was one of those who voted in favor of Prop. 215 and the way the Powers That Be just overturned it’s huge passing … well … the people spoke and the Government spoke back. I have not voted since then. What is the point of voting if our votes, WE THE PEOPLE don’t count, what’s the point?
Enough for now.
Have a Great Day All

Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

]]> By: Dusty http://www.drugwarrant.com/2009/10/legalization-discussion-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-3619 Dusty Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:53:54 +0000 http://www.drugwarrant.com/?p=4637#comment-3619 BRUCE! Where have you been? Google NWO... and while your at it you might find TheFluCase.com interesting. Also google the mass pharmaceutical drugging of this nation! They are creating diseases and disorders right along side EXPERIMENTAL DRUGS which are killing people right and left I might add, And they intend to make it a PUBLIC FORCED POLICY.. I call them "The Mod Squad" or Merchants Of Death if you prefer.. The LEADING cause of death in the civilized world (uh huh) is western medicine as we know it killing over a quarter of a million people in the US alone yearly. This includes medical mistakes, pharmaceutical, mis diagnosis and other factors. BRUCE! Where have you been? Google NWO… and while your at it you might find TheFluCase.com interesting. Also google the mass pharmaceutical drugging of this nation! They are creating diseases and disorders right along side EXPERIMENTAL DRUGS which are killing people right and left I might add, And they intend to make it a PUBLIC FORCED POLICY.. I call them “The Mod Squad” or Merchants Of Death if you prefer.. The LEADING cause of death in the civilized world (uh huh) is western medicine as we know it killing over a quarter of a million people in the US alone yearly.
This includes medical mistakes, pharmaceutical, mis diagnosis and other factors.

Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

]]> By: Dusty http://www.drugwarrant.com/2009/10/legalization-discussion-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-3618 Dusty Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:42:50 +0000 http://www.drugwarrant.com/?p=4637#comment-3618 OMG Wendy...lol I live about an hour from happy valley.. I thought it was that 98% of people there are on PROZAC!..lol OMG Wendy…lol I live about an hour from happy valley.. I thought it was that 98% of people there are on PROZAC!..lol

Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

]]> By: Dusty http://www.drugwarrant.com/2009/10/legalization-discussion-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-3617 Dusty Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:40:04 +0000 http://www.drugwarrant.com/?p=4637#comment-3617 OK one more. I am DEAD set against chemical process contraband. THIS should be the target, That is the problem. nearly ALL felonious criminal activity is conducted by users of meth and other drugs like PCP,lysergics and opioids. I'll probably get some hate over that, and yes I see how cities like Amsterdam handle "that" problem it is just that nearly all of the serious crimes I see on the news are committed by users of these dangerous compounds. What to users of cannabis want to do? 1 Put the barkalounger in over drive 2 Watch cartoons 3 have sex 4 Munch out 5 sleep They don't go out, they order in and kick back. They do not run amok reeking havoc and creating mayhem.I have yet to meet a violent cannabis user. OK one more. I am DEAD set against chemical process contraband. THIS should be the target, That is the problem. nearly ALL felonious criminal activity is conducted by users of meth and other drugs like PCP,lysergics and opioids. I’ll probably get some hate over that, and yes I see how cities like Amsterdam handle “that” problem it is just that nearly all of the serious crimes I see on the news are committed by users of these dangerous compounds.

What to users of cannabis want to do?
1 Put the barkalounger in over drive
2 Watch cartoons
3 have sex
4 Munch out
5 sleep

They don’t go out, they order in and kick back. They do not run amok reeking havoc and creating mayhem.I have yet to meet a violent cannabis user.

Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

]]> By: Dusty http://www.drugwarrant.com/2009/10/legalization-discussion-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-3616 Dusty Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:24:20 +0000 http://www.drugwarrant.com/?p=4637#comment-3616 OMG I just sent a copy of this to the White House! And added this addendum: Cannibis propositions I was surfing the web, just goofing off when I found a site called DrugWarRant.com and I left this comment: I thought I would share it with you all. Dusty November 5th, 2009 at 2:06 pm I’m not condoning or condeming the use or cannabis sative or indinca BUT.. There is always a BUT REMEMBER PROP 215? 88% in favor was over turned by the state keeping cannabis in prohibition… If they had ANY brains they’d sell it and handle it the same way they do liquor and tobacco products. One need not be a rocket scientist to do the math on that profit margin. YET in 1996 despite an overwhelming approval from the public they put it to vote and OVER TURNED IT! This presents the question as or weather not this was just a ploy to find out who’s who. Prop215 can be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Proposition_215_%281996%29 About that math. I did a little based on 100 per ounce on that capitol gain which could be handled ENTIRELY by state owned retail outlets .. I like “Buds Are Us”.. it is around 4 billion a year give or take 10% error. Now lets look at that “math” on a national scale. amd for fecal matter and giggling we say 2 billion in revenue for an avg allowing flexibility for individual states to control their own retail prices. READY?! 2000000000000 X 48,,, are you sitting down?..SIT.. $96000000000000,00 DEFICIT, WHAT NATIONAL DEFICIT? FOOD for thought. addendum: From a criminal stand point this would also pull the bottom out of the black market rendering cannibis COMPLETLY useless to criminal enterprize and placing that in the hands of state owned stores. The revenue would solve allot of trouble you gotta admit. I think some of this money could also be used to fully equip police depts all over the nation. Think about Las Vegas. They have the best equiped PD on the planet. Funded almost ENTIRELY on gambling revenues. Looking at the lesser or two weevils Cannibis is a very small bug. To the site owner: Not to worry about them finding out about your site... They already know about it. OMG I just sent a copy of this to the White House! And added this addendum:
Cannibis propositions

I was surfing the web, just goofing off when I found a site called DrugWarRant.com and I left this comment: I thought I would share it with you all.
Dusty
November 5th, 2009 at 2:06 pm

I’m not condoning or condeming the use or cannabis sative or indinca BUT.. There is always a BUT

REMEMBER PROP 215? 88% in favor was over turned by the state keeping cannabis in prohibition… If they had ANY brains they’d sell it and handle it the same way they do liquor and tobacco products. One need not be a rocket scientist to do the math on that profit margin. YET in 1996 despite an overwhelming approval from the public they put it to vote and OVER TURNED IT! This presents the question as or weather not this was just a ploy to find out who’s who.
Prop215 can be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Proposition_215_%281996%29

About that math. I did a little based on 100 per ounce on that capitol gain which could be handled ENTIRELY by state owned retail outlets .. I like “Buds Are Us”.. it is around 4 billion a year give or take 10% error.

Now lets look at that “math” on a national scale. amd for fecal matter and giggling we say 2 billion in revenue for an avg allowing flexibility for individual states to control their own retail prices. READY?! 2000000000000 X 48,,, are you sitting down?..SIT..

$96000000000000,00

DEFICIT, WHAT NATIONAL DEFICIT?

FOOD for thought.

addendum: From a criminal stand point this would also pull the bottom out of the black market rendering cannibis COMPLETLY useless to criminal enterprize and placing that in the hands of state owned stores. The revenue would solve allot of trouble you gotta admit. I think some of this money could also be used to fully equip police depts all over the nation. Think about Las Vegas. They have the best equiped PD on the planet. Funded almost ENTIRELY on gambling revenues. Looking at the lesser or two weevils Cannibis is a very small bug.

To the site owner: Not to worry about them finding out about your site… They already know about it.

Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

]]> By: Dusty http://www.drugwarrant.com/2009/10/legalization-discussion-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-3615 Dusty Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:06:44 +0000 http://www.drugwarrant.com/?p=4637#comment-3615 I'm not condoning or condeming the use or cannabis sative or indinca BUT.. There is always a BUT REMEMBER PROP 215? 88% in favor was over turned by the state keeping cannabis in prohibition... If they had ANY brains they'd sell it and handle it the same way they do liquor and tobacco products. One need not be a rocket scientist to do the math on that profit margin. YET in 1996 despite an overwhelming approval from the public they put it to vote and OVER TURNED IT! This presents the question as or weather not this was just a ploy to find out who's who. Prop215 can be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Proposition_215_%281996%29 About that math. I did a little based on 100 per ounce on that capitol gain which could be handled ENTIRELY by state owned retail outlets .. I like "Buds Are Us".. it is around 4 billion a year give or take 10% error. Now lets look at that "math" on a national scale. amd for fecal matter and giggling we say 2 billion in revenue for an avg allowing flexibility for individual states to control their own retail prices. READY?! 2000000000000 X 48,,, are you sitting down?..SIT.. $96000000000000,00 DEFICIT, WHAT NATIONAL DEFICIT? FOOD for thought. I’m not condoning or condeming the use or cannabis sative or indinca BUT.. There is always a BUT

REMEMBER PROP 215? 88% in favor was over turned by the state keeping cannabis in prohibition… If they had ANY brains they’d sell it and handle it the same way they do liquor and tobacco products. One need not be a rocket scientist to do the math on that profit margin. YET in 1996 despite an overwhelming approval from the public they put it to vote and OVER TURNED IT! This presents the question as or weather not this was just a ploy to find out who’s who.
Prop215 can be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Proposition_215_%281996%29

About that math. I did a little based on 100 per ounce on that capitol gain which could be handled ENTIRELY by state owned retail outlets .. I like “Buds Are Us”.. it is around 4 billion a year give or take 10% error.

Now lets look at that “math” on a national scale. amd for fecal matter and giggling we say 2 billion in revenue for an avg allowing flexibility for individual states to control their own retail prices. READY?! 2000000000000 X 48,,, are you sitting down?..SIT..

$96000000000000,00

DEFICIT, WHAT NATIONAL DEFICIT?

FOOD for thought.

Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

]]> By: Wendy http://www.drugwarrant.com/2009/10/legalization-discussion-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-3286 Wendy Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:17:35 +0000 http://www.drugwarrant.com/?p=4637#comment-3286 I read that Angel Raich survived surgery October 28th. Strength and Hope to You, Angel Raich, and Your Family. I read that Angel Raich survived surgery October 28th.

Strength and Hope to You, Angel Raich, and Your Family.

Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

]]> By: Wendy http://www.drugwarrant.com/2009/10/legalization-discussion-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-3267 Wendy Sat, 31 Oct 2009 00:32:55 +0000 http://www.drugwarrant.com/?p=4637#comment-3267 paul; yeah, I remembered that myself today. Thanks. But NASA did supposedly just waste $17M in moondust trial looking for a droplet of water. KSL.COM has something funny today; although it was found October 2nd, a seven-foot male plant was found out in the open city of Orem. Pretty Funny! paul; yeah, I remembered that myself today. Thanks.

But NASA did supposedly just waste $17M in moondust trial looking for a droplet of water.

KSL.COM has something funny today; although it was found October 2nd, a seven-foot male plant was found out in the open city of Orem. Pretty Funny!

Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

]]> By: BruceM http://www.drugwarrant.com/2009/10/legalization-discussion-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-3228 BruceM Fri, 30 Oct 2009 03:10:15 +0000 http://www.drugwarrant.com/?p=4637#comment-3228 Just to be clear, when I talk about collapse of the federal government, I don't mean fire and brimstone 2012 Mayan prophecy Nostradamus rapture crap. I do believe that Obama will be the last US president. The states will be on their own. They all already have governments (some more functional than others) so the transition from union to "group of 50 countries" will be relatively smooth and nonviolent (at least I think and hope so). Just to be clear, when I talk about collapse of the federal government, I don’t mean fire and brimstone 2012 Mayan prophecy Nostradamus rapture crap. I do believe that Obama will be the last US president. The states will be on their own. They all already have governments (some more functional than others) so the transition from union to “group of 50 countries” will be relatively smooth and nonviolent (at least I think and hope so).

Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

]]>