Nixon lied, thats all folk’s. Now this may come as a shocker, I know most realize politicians may tend to stretch the truth occasionally for our own good. Being they start out as humans and all. But guess what kiddies? Corporate CEO’s start out as humans too. I know this may put Libertarians and GOPerverts in a tizzy. But they lie, cheat and steal too. They have by Historical accounts, not just gossip. They have intentionally kept their business’ going long after receiving evidence they were harming people. Now we even estimate the value of citizens lives to the profits and hardship on business. Like disclosing the toxic environment and unhealthy products the Meat Industry puts out is what got Oprah busted.

Monsanto and Cliarence Thomas gutting environmental laws. Same as Exxon tying up costly courts appeal after appeal to relieve themselves of the responsibility of the Exxon Valdez spill. Monsanto and their hatchetman Cliarence Thomas tied up the lawsuit 7 years while citizens of St Louis lived with it. How much collateral damage from the lies in Iraq? Haliburton Asbestos Co knew it was selling carcinogens, with Dick Cheney as CEO. Billions in lawsuits to victims. Then the Lie in Iraq, no bid contracts and much of the $Trillion spent went into their pockets. Enron gouging fuel prices to California, while buying up Power plants and running them to the ground. Causing the brown outs, causing the recall, calling the Aunuld to get invited to the Bohemian Grove. First act is to veto the Hemp Initiative.

Traffic jams are design projects, more gas spent. Hell, they start conventional police actions, those you can profit on. Even sanctioned by Congress Wars, you can’t profit on. Like Iraq before Mission Accomplished. Now its a police action the same as the Ganjawar. These ends justifying means are not new. Lies don’t mean a thing if its the enemy you’re lying too. Making us sick, selling us mandatory white powders to “treat” it, lot better than killing us for nothing. The end is get the Presidency and Congress by any means possible, then you deal the cards. Getting more power that doesn’t come by fair trade methods. Wallmart, Nike Mickey D using slave labor. NAFTA/GATT sending jobs overseas, isn’t just for cheap labor/more profits.

Its a deterrent to those with jobs to stay silent. Whistle blowing can be hazardous to your employment, and being jobless is the hardest job on the civilian market. So I’m reasonably certain corporations are fabricated by those at least starting out as humans. Same as the World Banksters with no sovereignty to the U.S. Making $300 billion a year in interest… on Boosh’s loans… to bail out the Insurance Racketeers and Banksters? But granny’s arthritis is relieved with a toke of Ganja and caging her seems OK with the Church’s and Soccer moms protecting their tikes from heathen devil weed plants. That might interfere with their kiddy’s speed Ritalin.

Corporations for the most part control the legislators and even what is moral within the church. Those twins selling Coors for Geeeeezus? The every 20 minute commercial about Yaz or Viagra, with 90% of the time disclosing side effects. Time driving up cost of Insurance or drugs. Money from price profits paying for propaganda to keep the status weird and stagnant. No profit in prevention or cures. Just “treatment”. Just too many damn coincidences.

I’m sure there’s a buzzword to counter just about anything humans do. Simply put we the people can not be trusted with power. Not one human, without huge masses of people suffering. So for the gazillionth time… We MUST, no question about it, it is MANDATORY for us humans to have Checks and Balances. Probably why the forefathers put so much time into including them.

Corporations have sold the welfare of the people for lies about what the people need, for profit. Not Democracy, Freedom, Liberty or jelly beans, except one maybe. Profit is what the machine eats. Not compassion, not Peace, Not cures or prevention shutting down the machine. Or converting it to a Green Machine. The corporations maintain the dysfunction of the Ganjawar, through their employees that we elect, or at least think we elect.

If the CSA is permitted to stay as law, then this microcosm will continue to unfold in the other arena’s, as it is starting to do. Education, Homelessness, Poverty, Hunger, even Famine, is happening in spite of the modern technology and corporate moralists. When Hemp and Ganja could inexpensively take care of the business of the people, not just mouthfart the words with false intentions.

Ganja is not a schedule#1 narcotic by the laws of physics and the definition of the CSA. Toss out the lie and Hemp and Medicinal are free by default. Then we can establish an infrastructure and sentry to keep zealots out of the Capitol. Every decade for 4 now, I’ve seen it hover. Outbursts occasionally, reform occasionally. But it never changes much. It ain’t supposed too. Perpetuate is the money ticket. Keeps competition off the shelves and tax payers donating to the private prisons, military and police bloated budgets.

Truth and the Laws of Physics will free the Ganja and Hemp plants. Therefore pretty much collapsing the war on some drugs. Pushing $300 million in Hemp sales, While obesity is epidemic and farmers going broke. $? in buyers clubs and billions on the streets while booze is clearly the slob method of forgetting, rather than peacefully reducing the stress as Ganja does. Ain’t nothing new. Pre-Yuppies in suits and gowns toking openly in 69. When will they ever learn. Or is that the reason for censored school books, so they don’t?

Marijuana: the law vs. 12 million people
Life magazine Oct 31, 1969. 25-35
In New York a group of middle-aged professional people begin an evening with a marijuana “cocktail party.” in Detroit some lawyers and executives get together in the small hours for wine-and-pot. In Beverly Hills, at a stately black-tie dinner, the matronly hostess beckons the butler who brings a silver tray with a single after-dinner joint to be passed around.

Virtues’ of Ganja

What No One Wants to Know About Ganja
From The Natural Mind by Dr. Andrew Weil
(last half of chapter four pg. 86-97)
Because marijuana is such an unimpressive pharmacological agent, it is not a very interesting drug to study in a laboratory. Pharmacologists cannot get a handle on it with their methods, and because they cannot see the reality of the non-material state of consciousness that users experience, they are forced to design experimental situations very far removed from the real world in order to get measurable effects. There are three conditions under which marijuana can be shown to impair general psychological performance in laboratory subjects. They are: continued… http://deoxy.org/pdfa/marijuana.htm

Marijuana Drug Czar Distorts Report
Astonishingly, Walters claims that the 1999 Institute of Medicine report didn’t urge the government to allow seriously ill people legal access to medical marijuana on a case-by-case basis. What the institute did say about medical use of marijuana by AIDS and cancer patients was “nausea, appetite loss, pain and anxiety are all afflictions of wasting, and all can be mitigated by marijuana.” Maybe these experts were duped. Maybe John Walters, unbeknown to us, has medical expertise beyond that of the world’s leading physicians and researchers. Or maybe he’s lying in a desperate attempt to save a collapsing policy.

After the third cup of coffee, the stimulant effect begins to level off rapidly even if the dose is doubled or tripled thereafter. A similar situation obtains with marijuana- there comes a point where the effect reaches a plateau. And particularly in the case of experienced users, that plateau stops well short of impairment of functions like motor coordination and judgement.

Put another way: as a practical matter, all other factors being equal, it’s pretty much impossible for any amount of smoked cannabis to produce the same hazardous level of impairment as the consumption of one double martini in the space of an hour.

No doubt, it’s possible to torture an experimental methodology to produce exceptions. But I’m speaking of the general run of real-world conditions. In vivo, one might say.

It might be possible for a large person with a high tolerance for alcohol to outperform a cannabis-ingesting “naive subject” after drinking one double martini. (Although not after two or three of them.) I speak of the rule here, and not the exception.

There is an additive effect from combining marijuana with alcohol ingestion- but just as is the case with benzodiazepine tranquilizers, it’s the alcohol in the combination that is the critical factor. And no one in this society is talking about withdrawing Valium or Clonidine from the market, simply because the mix poorly with alcohol- even though unlike the case with marijuana, that “poor mix” is quite capable of being a lethal combination. A high BAC of alcohol mixed with marijuana is a recipe for violent nausea and vomiting. But because even pure THC isn’t close to having the CNS effects of tranquilizers and sleeping pills, marijuana doesn’t lead to gravely toxic overdose effects, even when combined with huge amounts of alcohol.

By contrast, the combination of alcohol with as small an amount as 5mg of Valium produces a massive synergistic effect- increasing the power of the tranquilizer at least 5-10 fold.

That said, it’s tough to overdose on Valium alone- but it isn’t impossible.

For that matter, it’s possible to lethally overdose on Tylenol. Aspirin. Even caffeine pills. And people do, year in and year out.

But not marijuana.

And in terms of the impairment of judgement, no other drug can compare to the effect of large amounts of alcohol. Compared to alcohol, nearly everyone ingesting even the most potent mind-altering drugs retains enough insight into their condition that they recognize when it’s the case that they’re too impaired to drive. Contrast that with alcohol- where nearly everyone in the bar scene has witnessed drunk people insisting that they’re perfectly capable of navigating an automobile, even when their knees are buckling under them.

The impairment of judgement by an alcohol BAC of much over .10 is frankly so huge that I think it would be difficult, if not impossible, to design an experimental protocol to properly measure its magnitude. But I’d hardly refer to the observations of that effect under “real-world conditions” as “merely anecdotal”, or “a series of one case.” It’s commonplace and axiomatic that the negative effect of a large quantity of alcohol on personal judgment is pronounced.

The same is simply not the case with marijuana use. While some people- particularly naive subjects, or those unfamiliar with its effects- report feelings of dysphoria or disorientation from using cannabis, this almost never translates into the sort of impaired judgment that leads to people putting themselves or others physically at risk. Once again- while it would be difficult if not impossible to design a lab experiment to measure the effect of cannabis as far as producing reckless behavior, the evidence of widespread empirical observations in real-life conditions over a long period of time doesn’t lead anywhere near a conclusion that cannabis produces a public health risk in that regard. Consider the observations of the La Guardia report, or the Costa Rica study by Ver Rubin, for example.

It’s particularly critical to realize the truth of this as far as refuting claims of an increased public health hazard due to so-called “driving impairment” by cannabis. Considering how widely it’s been used in the USA over the last 40 or so years, if cannabis use were leading to an increase in the rate of auto accidents- particularly serious ones- there should be a mountain of evidence to demonstrate that case by now, with the most reliable indicator coming from epidemiological trends. And that evidence is simply absent from the record.

Consider that despite the much vaunted rise in marijuana use (especially by adults) between 1994 and 2008- and the much-touted increased availability of “superpot” in that time frame- vehicle fatalities per 100 million miles driven have DROPPED steadily EVERY YEAR in the U.S., from the 1994 rate of 1.74 fatalities per 100 million miles driven, to the 2008 rate of 1.27 fatalities per million miles driven.

http://www-fars.nhtsa.dot.gov/Main/index.aspx

Statements like this really get me lol.
I used to smoke cigs. The point was cause it made me feel good. I drink beer because it makes me feel good. I eat food cause it makes me feel good. I have sex cause it makes me feel good. All of that is ok,but if I should smoke a bowl, its not ok to feel good? WTF?

Yes you can just take one toke and control the amount of feel good you get,just like another drug, oh ya that evil alcohol. Really,if your not drinking to feel good,just drink water. If your not smoking cannabis to feel good, just breath the free air.

Freaking people ,I swear they are drinking the koolaid.

second of all unlike alcohol, you can snap out of a high. It usually takes something that gets your adrenaline pumping but the fact still remains. You can snap right out of it and be strait as a judge when those blue lights are flashing behind you…. no such thing with alcohol