Comments on: Comments from a fan

By: Wendy

Wendy — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 19:31:45 +0000

Hello everyone – lots of progress indeed for our more than worthy cause. I am proud of us (U.S.)!

Utah has had numerous cash crops this year as usual so far and no culprits!

That hemp should have at least been given over to industry elsewhere in the sane part of this Great Nation….perhaps Oregon. (smile…)

But at least, the medicinal side of God’s plants are evidently as sacred as they ever were.

God please bless us all and our troops to come home safely and real soon. Amen.

0 0

By: iDub

iDub — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:51:31 +0000

That’s how you know we’re winning!!! Keep frustrating these morons!

iDub

0 0

By: angryJoe

angryJoe — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:34:38 +0000

OK, “Bob”, fair enough. You keep your highway dogs. But I have a dog that sniffs out Disorderly Conduct on public forums. Rover picked up on your offensive words and threatening tone directed at an individual. Shortly, several officers will burst into your home, shoot your dog, kick your wife in the stomach, and slap you down to the kitchen floor.

And they know you’ve been spewing foul language, bad grammar and poor sentence structure all over town, so you’ll be charged with several other crimes as well.

And we can all rest better knowing that one more Disorderly Conduct Statute offending, English abusing, degenerate dirtbag like you is off the (digital) streets.

0 0

By: Jesper Kristensen

Jesper Kristensen — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:39:50 +0000

@smapdi: if I were to be trapped in an elevator with said Bob I’d probably use my 30 seconds to point out that:

“Bob, the policy – having made a blanket criminalization – is indeed the very cause of a market being served by dirtbags. Who do you think is most attracted to the profit opportunities in such a market? It’s in fact the current policy, Bob, that has in fact handed the streets to criminals, because no decent citizen can legally operate on the market. It’s unfortunately a fact borne out of international studies that stricter law enforcement or toughter penalties do not result in lower drug use or less crime.”

0 0

By: kaptinemo

kaptinemo — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 10:49:13 +0000

For the sake of ‘benefit of the doubt’ I’ll assume that Bob’s ‘offering’ was made in satirical jest. Seeing as he hasn’t come back ‘here’ since, perhaps he was someone lampooning the prohib side. In which case, I’d have to say he did a thorough job of it. Thanks, Bob!

0 0

By: R.O.E.

R.O.E. — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 07:41:38 +0000

Let the truth do its job and the people will follow.

Slugs like BOB will just die off as an exstinct spieces.

0 0

By: Servetus

Servetus — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 04:05:06 +0000

Bob really cracked up, didn’t he? Could be something else, though. I wonder if Bob went out on a bender after his little blogging tirade. Maybe he started a bar fight and got the rest of his teeth knocked out.

0 0

By: claygooding

claygooding — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 22:44:35 +0000

PS. I better light my bong

0 0

By: claygooding

claygooding — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 22:42:13 +0000

All the anti-pot people had better hope they don’t succeed in blocking everyones marijuana. That is all it would take for the tokers to deystroy them,and it may be what it takes.

0 0

By: Dreau Preau

Dreau Preau — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 19:38:15 +0000

I wonder if bob realizes just how many profiteers in the pharmaceuticals and prisons are just as bad as his machiavellian drug dealers as far as the suffering they cause for personal gain.

0 0